Plans of seminars and practical classes in the discipline: Labor Law. Little known heroes. General Potapov Questions for the test on labor law

home » ecosystems Plans of seminars and practical classes in the discipline: Labor Law. Little known heroes. General Potapov Questions for the test on labor law

A general whom the enemy rated higher than his own command. The contribution to the common victory of General Potapov and the 5th Army entrusted to him can hardly be overestimated - historians do not exclude that it was her staunch defense that prevented the fall of Moscow in the fall of 1941.

My acquaintance with the fate of Mikhail Ivanovich Potapov and the history of the 5th Army of the Southwestern Front began by accident. A few years ago, digging on the Internet, I noticed a map of the Soviet-German front as of August 25, 1941, apparently borrowed from some English-language resource. By this time, the Germans occupied Novgorod, Smolensk, approached Bryansk, besieged Odessa in the south and reached the line of the Dnieper from Kremenchug to the mouth.

And only to the south of the Pinsk swamps, a powerful wedge for several hundred kilometers literally pierced into the thickness of the territory occupied by the Nazis. On the tip of this wedge was the laconic inscription "5 POTAPOV". It was the 5th Army of the Southwestern Front under the command of Major General Potapov.

Undoubtedly, the front line could not be uniform, in its different sections, formations that did not match in number and strength opposed each other, and many circumstances influenced success or disaster. In addition, such a wedge could not exist for a long time, since it easily turned into an environment. From the south, the Germans came close to Kyiv, and it was necessary to level the front in order to organize a stable defense of the city. A potential threat was also brewing for the right flank of the 5th Army, after the German troops of Army Group Center, bypassing the marshy Pripyat basin, reached the Gomel-Starodub line. On August 19, the 5th Army received an order to withdraw beyond the Dnieper to a depth of 140-180 kilometers. And yet, the fact that the retreat path of the 5th Army from the western border of the USSR, even for some time, turned out to be almost three times shorter than that of its neighbors, aroused a desire to learn as much as possible about this formation and its commander.

During the first two months of the war, Potapov’s troops hung menacingly from the north over the German Army Group South, but even after the retreat across the Dnieper, the 5th Army had a noticeable influence on the decisions of the high command of the Reich armed forces. In his very first directive on military operations on the Eastern Front (Directive No. 33 of 07/19/1941), Hitler points out: "The enemy 5th Army must be quickly and decisively defeated." But it does not work out quickly and decisively, and the next directive No. 34 of 07/30/41 again instructs the German troops to "force the 5th Red Army ... to force the battle west of the Dnieper and destroy it." The Fuhrer did not rule out a breakthrough of Potapov's troops to the north through Polesie to the flank of Army Group Center and demanded that measures be taken to prevent this, frankly, an unlikely maneuver. Two weeks pass and Hitler again irritably reminds that "the 5th Russian army must be ... finally destroyed." (Annex to Directive No. 34 of 12.08.41). However, a few days later, Potapov's army hid behind the wide expanse of the Dnieper.
One should not be surprised at the Fuhrer's persistence - he saw the same maps of hostilities that we see now, and quite adequately perceived the threat posed by the activity of the troops under the command of Potapov. Finally, on August 21, Hitler issues an order in which he repeats three times (!) the idea of the need to destroy the 5th Army. But the main thing is that for the first time he is ready to allocate "as many divisions as necessary" to carry out this task. Along with the success of the operation to blockade Leningrad, the Fuhrer considers the defeat of Potapov's army among the prerequisites for a successful offensive "against the Timoshenko group of troops", that is, the Western Front. It turns out that the way to Moscow, according to Hitler, lay through the defeated 5th Army.
I learned all these details later, but when I examined the map, the name Potapov, alas, did not tell me anything. Gradually, after getting acquainted with documents and studies, conversations with the widow of the commander Marianna Fedorovna Modorova, the amazing life path of this person was revealed to me.

From deacons to generals

Mikhail Ivanovich Potapov was born in October 1902 in the village of Mochalovo in the Yukhnovsky district of the then Smolensk province, now the Kaluga region. Although in the questionnaires, the future commander-5 referred his parents to "middle peasants", rather, they should be considered wealthy artisans: Mikhail's father was a contractor when paving roads and streets.
Without leaving the limits of the parish, Mikhail received a very worthy for a village boy elementary education. AT rural school his teacher was the "easier" prince from the Gagarin family, later he studied at the parish school at the church in the neighboring village of Putogino. The St. Petersburg millionaire book publisher, a native of these places, Ignatius Tuzov, acted as a trustee of the temple and the school, so, for sure, they cared about the level of knowledge of the students here.

First World War and the economic crisis did not have the best effect on the Potapov family well-being. As a teenager, Mikhail began to help his father. October revolution The Potapovs met in Kharkov, where they worked as bridgemen in a tram depot.

By the spring of 1920, Mikhail returned to his native Mochalovo, and in May he became a Red Army soldier in the Yukhnov military registration and enlistment office. Formally, Potapov is considered a participant in the Civil War, but he did not take a direct part in the hostilities.

Potapov, after completing cavalry courses in Minsk in September 1922, was appointed commander of a platoon of the 43rd cavalry regiment of the Volga Military District. It was not easy for a 20-year-old young man who did not smell gunpowder to command experienced horsemen from the Cossacks, many of whom had two wars behind them. Oddly enough, a thorough knowledge of church rites contributed to gaining authority among his subordinates - in Putogino, Mikhail not only studied at the temple, but also served for some time as a deacon. From the diaconate, Potapov will have a well-placed luxurious baritone for the rest of his life. Many years later, already being a general in the Soviet army, the former deacon did not shy away from attending church services in full "parade".

Two years later, already in the position of assistant squadron commander, Potapov leaves for Moscow, for military chemical courses. The new place of service is the 67th Cavalry Regiment of the North Caucasus Military District. Since 1931, he has been studying again - now as a student of the Military Academy of Motorization and Mechanization of the Red Army. The cavalryman becomes a tanker. After graduating from the academy in 1936, his career develops rapidly, which, however, is typical for many future commanders of the Great Patriotic War. It took Potapov exactly four years to go from the chief of staff of the regiment to the commander of the army.

Undoubtedly, a meeting with Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov played a significant role in his career. It happened in May 1937 in Belarus, where Potapov commanded a regiment, and Zhukov commanded a division. By the time they met, the future marshal had already received a new appointment, but since then the countrymen have not let each other out of their sight. In the book “Memoirs and Reflections”, Georgy Konstantinovich writes: “Practically during field exercises and maneuvers and in the 3rd and 6th corps, I had to act with the 21st separate tank brigade (brigade commander M.I. Potapov). This commander was my colleague in the past, and we understood each other in a “combat situation”, perfectly. When in June 1939 Zhukov was offered to head the operation against the Japanese army at Khalkhin Gol, he insisted on appointing Potapov as his deputy.

They flew to the Far East in one plane. Marshal recalled: “Brigade commander Potapov was my deputy. On his shoulders lay a lot of work on organizing the interaction of formations and military branches, and when we launched a general offensive, Mikhail Ivanovich was entrusted with the leadership of the main grouping on the right wing of the front.

In June 1940, Zhukov became the commander of the troops of the Kyiv Special Military District, at the same time Potapov was transferred to the KOVO to the post of commander of the 4th mechanized corps. Six months later, Mikhail Ivanovich becomes army commander. In February 1941, Zhukov, appointed chief of the General Staff, moved to Moscow. To meet again countrymen had a chance only in the post-war years.

It remains to be regretted that the remarkable mutual understanding of the two military leaders could not be used for the cause of Victory. I note that these were very dissimilar personalities, in some ways even opposite, but this circumstance only contributed to their mutual attraction.
Blitzkrieg failed.

In the event of an enemy attack, Potapov's army was responsible for "cover area No. 1", 170 km long from Vlodava to Krystynopol in the north of the Ukrainian section of the Soviet-German border. In the last days of peace, Potapov took a number of measures to increase the combat capability of the army. On the night of June 16-17, units of the 62nd Infantry Division set out from the camp and, after two night marches, reached positions near the border. On June 18, Potapov ordered the 45th Rifle Division to be withdrawn from the firing range. On the same day, the 135th Rifle Division received an order to advance to the border.

But this could not change the general situation, which, with the outbreak of hostilities, developed extremely unfavorably for our troops. On the Sokal ledge, the Germans achieved a threefold superiority in manpower and equipment. The Soviet divisions, stretched along the front, could not hold back the blow of the German army corps, densely built on the directions of the main attack. The mechanized units of the 5th Army were only pulling up to the border from their places of deployment.

Nevertheless, from the very first hours of the war, Potapov's troops fought stubbornly and skillfully. For each destroyed or burned down Soviet tank, the formations of the 1st Panzer Group von Kleist suffered 2.5-3 times more damage. The 5th Army not only defended desperately, but also launched counterattacks on the enemy. “The leadership of the enemy troops in front of Army Group South is amazingly energetic, its continuous flank and frontal attacks cause us heavy losses,” said Franz Halder, Chief of the General Staff of the Ground Forces, in his notes.

On June 26, the counter-offensive of the South-West Front began in the Brody-Lutsk-Dubno triangle, where the first tank battle in the history of World War II took place. Four Soviet mechanized corps (two from the 5th Army) failed to build on the initial success. The inconsistent position of the front command also played its role, which, at the height of the fighting in the triangle, ordered to go on the defensive, and then returned to the offensive plan again.

I will note such a detail: in these days of fierce confrontation, namely on June 30, Potapov issued an order in which he pointed out the inadmissibility of shooting prisoners of war.

On July 1, against the backdrop of a general withdrawal of front troops, the 5th Army launched a powerful counterattack on the northern flank of the German offensive. In particular, the 20th Panzer Division pushed back enemy units by 10–12 km, destroyed up to 1,000 enemy soldiers, 10 tanks, and 2 batteries.

Army General S.M. Shtemenko wrote: "The 5th Army ... became, as they say, a thorn in the eye of the Nazi generals, put up strong resistance to the enemy and inflicted significant damage on him."

The fascist German troops failed to quickly break through the front here. Potapov's divisions knocked them off the road Lutsk - Rovno - Zhytomyr and forced them to abandon an immediate attack on Kyiv.
Shtemenko, in those months one of the leading employees of the Operational Directorate of the General Staff of the Red Army, had in mind the successful counteroffensive of the 5th Army, undertaken on July 10. Then Potapov's tankers, behind the backs of the formations of the III Army Corps, intercepted the Novograd-Volynsky - Zhytomyr highway at a width of over 10 km. What a headache for the Germans was the loss of this most important communication can be judged by the fact that the commander of the Army Group "South" Gerd von Runstedt seriously planned to use aviation to transfer the infantry regiment "Hermann Goering" to the Zhytomyr region.
While Potapov's troops attacked the northern flank of the German offensive, the defenders of Kyiv got a breather. The command of the 6th German Army was forced to declare: "The nature of the threat to our troops from the main forces of the 5th Russian Army is still such that this threat should be eliminated before the attack on Kyiv." The loss of the Ukrainian capital was postponed for two months.

German military historian Alfred Philippi also points out that the reason for the slowdown in the advance of Army Group South was the opposition of the 5th Army. “And although this opposition ... was not completely unexpected for the German command, it nevertheless brought tactical successes to the Russians from the very beginning of the campaign, and then in the Novograd-Volynsky, Zhitomir region it also acquired operational significance, much more serious than it can be was to be assumed. This had a rather significant paralyzing effect on the will of the 6th Army command to carry out the main operational task, which was to reach the Dnieper near Kyiv.

In late July - early August, during the battles for the Korostensky fortified area, Potapov's army again not only sought to keep the Germans with a solid defense, but also with decisive counterattacks and pressure on the flanks forced the attackers to weaken the blow. Here the enemy concentrated 11 divisions against the 5th Army. If we take into account that the staff of the German infantry division was 14 thousand people, then the enemy troops were at least twice as large as the forces available to Potapov. The German military historian Werner Haupt notes that "the 5th Soviet Army, under the command of the talented Major General Potapov, was located on the left flank of the 6th German Army and inflicted very heavy losses on it." After the war, it will be calculated that, on average, for every day of hostilities in the zone of the 5th Army, there were from 8 to 10 strikes by our troops against the enemy.

On August 9, Commander von Rundstedt gave the order to suspend the offensive at the Kyiv-Korosten line and temporarily go on the defensive in order to disperse the troops in depth and provide them with the opportunity to rest. In an assessment of the situation presented in the OKH, the command of Army Group South expressed a rather pessimistic opinion about the situation on its northern wing. It was even suggested that the Russians intended to "go on the offensive from the Kyiv region and from the Ovruch region in order to defeat the northern wing of the army group." However, the physical exhaustion and losses that von Rundstedt complained about had no less, if not more, effect on the state of Soviet troops.
fatal triumph?

Thus, Hitler's order of August 21, aimed at the destruction of Potapov's troops, looked quite reasonable. It is impossible to call spontaneous the idea to perform this task to allocate the tank forces of Guderian, who operated in Belarus. A month earlier, in the very first document concerning the 5th Army - Directive No. 33 of 07/19/1941, the Fuhrer had already proposed using the southern flank of Army Group Center for an operation north of Kyiv. Perhaps he considered noteworthy the proposal that came the day before from the headquarters of the "southerners": to strike through Mozyr on Ovruch with the forces of the 35th Corps of Army Group Center. On August 9, von Rundstedt again asked for help from his neighbors.

Consequently, by August 21, Hitler had a firm conviction about how the campaign in the East should develop. First, it is possible to start an offensive against Moscow only after the defeat of the 5th Army, which, on the one hand, will ensure the security of the right flank of the troops aimed at the Soviet capital, and on the other hand, will create favorable conditions for operations in Ukraine by the von Rundstedt group. Secondly, to successfully achieve this goal, it is necessary to involve the forces of Army Group Center. Do not forget that for the Fuhrer, the priority was the methodical destruction of enemy forces on the territory, regardless of geographical or political goals. As early as July 13, he declared to the commander-in-chief of the ground forces, Walter von Brauchitsch: "It is not so important to quickly advance to the East, how to destroy the enemy's manpower."

Meanwhile, the general staff was almost unanimously inclined to reinforce Army Group Center and strike directly on a narrow front in the direction of Moscow. The Fuhrer's order to turn south caused the greatest displeasure in the key figure of the upcoming operation, the commander of the 2nd tank group, Heinz Guderian: “On August 23, I was summoned to the headquarters of the Army Group Center for a meeting in which the chief of the general staff of the ground forces took part. He told us that Hitler decided to attack first of all not on Leningrad and not on Moscow, but on Ukraine and the Crimea ... We were all deeply convinced that the attack planned by Hitler on Kyiv would inevitably lead to a winter campaign with all its difficulties ... " .

These lines, written after the war, clearly belong to the genre of generals' memoirs "How Hitler prevented us from winning." “It is always easier to extol the merits of some hypothetical alternative than to justify caution and disappointing reality. And in this case, moreover, it turned out that all the people who opposed the offensive in the center had already died. Keitel, Jodl, Kluge, Hitler himself - they did not have time to write exculpatory memoirs, ”said British military historian Alan Clark, not without sarcasm.
In fact, in the 20s of August 1941, the question was not so categorical: either to Moscow or to Ukraine. The operation against Potapov's troops was conceived by the Fuhrer as an auxiliary one precisely within the framework of the Wehrmacht's decisive offensive against the capital of the USSR.

On August 30, in a conversation between Hitler and Halder, it was noted that the troops of the Army Group "Center" turned to Ukraine not for the "war in the south", but in order to start the "operation against Tymoshenko's troops" as soon as possible. The Fuhrer's order of August 21 notes that the defeat of the 5th Army should guarantee the South Army Group "the possibility of creating a bridgehead on the eastern bank of the Dnieper in its middle course, so that the center and left wing would then continue the offensive in the direction of Kharkov, Rostov." As we can see, the immediate task looks rather modest, and the capture of Kyiv, let alone the defeat of the South-Western Front, is out of the question at all.

The German generals could not then know for sure that Guderian's turn to the south would lead to a winter campaign, as "fast Heinz" claims in his notes, nor could they know that the fragile building of the Southwestern Front would fall apart and bury it under its rubble. plans for a quick and smooth transition to an offensive against Moscow. Because it was no longer Hitler's directives, but the rapid development of events - which were developing very favorably for the Germans - dictated the logic of actions to the German command.

On September 1, the following report comes from the headquarters of Army Group South: “If the enemy in Eastern Ukraine is not destroyed, then neither Army Group South nor Army Group Center will be able to attack unceasingly ... Strike at Moskovsky direction earlier than in Ukraine is impossible due to the fact that the operation already begun by Army Group "South" and the actions of the southern wing of Army Group "Center" in support of this operation went too far (highlighted by me. - M.Z.) to transfer the main efforts in another area ... ". The Germans had no other choice but to act according to the situation. The rapid advance of Guderian in the north and the occupation of the Derievsky bridgehead near Kremenchug on the southern flank of the South-Western Front prompted von Runstedt on September 4, even without agreement with the high command, to order a decisive offensive.

According to Werner Haupt, the battle for Kyiv was the most important battle of the entire war: “Because of the events of the next two weeks, the decisive German attack on Moscow was ignored. This probably changed the outcome of the Eastern Campaign." But we repeat: everything that happened is the result of a paradoxical situation, when the very real prospect of defeating an entire front made adjustments to the strategy and tactics of the enemy, and the catastrophe of the Soviet troops and the triumph of the Nazi armies in the Kiev pocket took away a whole month from the Germans and moved the date of the decisive attack on Moscow to the beginning the onset of cold weather.

Chronicle of the disaster

Unfortunately, the miscalculations of the command of the Southwestern Front made it easier for the Germans to solve their problems. Together with the 5th Army, the 27th Rifle Corps also retreated beyond the Dnieper. Meanwhile, the corps not only did not obey Potapov, but also made a withdrawal according to its own schedule. An easily predictable inconsistency led to the fact that on August 23 the Germans broke through a weak rearguard curtain at the junction of the army and the corps, reached the Dnieper north of Kyiv near Okuninovo, captured the bridge and occupied a bridgehead on the eastern bank. Parts of the 5th Army and the 37th Army under the command of A.A. Vlasov unsuccessfully tried to eliminate the expanding Okuninov grouping of the enemy.

On August 29, Potapov tried to launch a counteroffensive, this time without success. Not surprising, because the 5th Army has ceased to be that formidable force that it was a month ago. Almost a third of it (five divisions) was transferred to the 37th Army; The 135th Rifle Division and the 5th Artillery Antitank Brigade were transferred to the 40th Army. The 1st Airborne Corps, which entered the front reserve, was also withdrawn from the 5th Army. Due to the lack of tanks, the 9th and 19th mechanized corps had to be reorganized into battalions. Rifle divisions, due to heavy losses, had no more than 20-25% of the personnel.

Only the immediate withdrawal of the 5th Army to the Desna River made it possible to avoid the danger of encirclement. On the morning of August 30, Potapov addressed the Military Council of the South-Western Front with such a proposal, but it did not meet with due understanding.

On the same day, the 21st Army of the Bryansk Front unexpectedly withdrew from its positions, and Wehrmacht units immediately rushed into the gap on the outskirts of Chernigov. On September 1, the Germans occupied a bridgehead on the banks of the Desna in the near rear of the 5th Army. The units abandoned to eliminate the breakthrough failed to succeed. The countdown to the inevitable catastrophe began.
On the evening of September 5, Potapov again turned to the front commander Kirponos on the HF with a proposal to withdraw troops, but received a categorical refusal. It is noteworthy that it was on this day, according to Halder's notes, that Hitler first spoke about the Kiev cauldron. Only on September 9, the Headquarters authorized the withdrawal of the 5th Army to the Desna River. By this time, Potapov's main forces were securely surrounded. From the entire army of 70 thousand personnel, less than 4 thousand fighters remained, as well as about 200 guns and mortars of various systems.

At the end of September 14, Potapov and his headquarters once again made an attempt to stop the withdrawal of the remnants of the army, and delay the advance of superior enemy forces. However, it was not possible to gain a foothold on any of the subsequent lines, since the Germans, pushing from the front, simultaneously bypassed both flanks. And on the morning of September 16, at the headquarters of the 5th Army, it became known that even the day before, in the rear of the front in the area of \u200b\u200bLokhvitsa (Poltava region), the troops of the 2nd tank group of Guderian, advancing from the north, had joined forces with the troops of the 1st tank group of Kleist, who had broken through from south. Five Soviet armies have already been surrounded. The Kyiv cauldron has become a reality. According to German data, more than 660 thousand soldiers and officers of the Red Army were captured, 884 tanks and more than 3 thousand guns were captured.

On September 21, a combined detachment of the remnants of the headquarters of the front and the 5th Army gave the last battle to the enemy. Potapov was shell-shocked and lost consciousness. In the heat of battle, the general was mistaken for the dead and hastily "buried", throwing the bodies of the dead. Potapov's documents were handed over to Kirill Semenovich Moskalenko, the future marshal, and then the commander of the 15th Rifle Corps of the 5th Army. “I literally sobbed when they handed over the documents of our army commander to me. I didn’t know at all what would happen to us now, since Mikhail Ivanovich died.”
The bitter fate of the commander

Three days later, Potapov was discovered by the Germans. The trial of captivity began. In the Nazi concentration camps, the paths of Mikhail Ivanovich intersected with Generals M. Lukin and I. Muzychenko, Senior Lieutenant Y. Dzhugashvili, the leaders of the defense of the Brest Fortress, Major P. Gavrilov and Captain I. Zubachev. In 1992, the reports and transcripts of Potapov's interrogations were made public, who, when asked whether "the Russian people are ready to wage war if the army retreats to the Urals," replied: "Yes, he will remain in a state of moral defense, and the Red Army will continue to resist. German investigators assessed the behavior of the Red Army general in the following way: “as a prisoner he behaved with dignity”, “he referred to his ignorance on issues of a strategic nature”, “answered questions regarding his future with restraint”. Even the Germans described Potapov as a "Russian nationalist", although it is difficult to say what exactly they meant by this wording.

Potapov categorically refused to cooperate with the traitors from the ROA. At the same time, Mikhail Ivanovich spoke respectfully about Vlasov himself until the end of his life, did not believe in the betrayal of his southern “neighbor” on the Southwestern Front, believing that the Germans somehow used the general for their own purposes against his will.

The victorious spring of the 45th, Mikhail Ivanovich met in the "general's" camp Hammelburg. April 22 came close to them American troops. The camp commandant went with a white flag to Patton's army. The Americans arrived at the camp and transported all the prisoners to their place, then they transferred them to the French, and the recent prisoners of war returned home from Paris.
However, the homeland met them unkindly. Literally from the gangway of the plane, Potapov and his comrades were sent to the "object" in Golitsino near Moscow. A special check took place for seven months, which left indelible marks in the soul of Mikhail Ivanovich.

Until the end of his life, the invariably balanced and witty Potapov grew gloomy and closed at the mention of the name of the former SMERSH chief Abakumov, whom he considered a rare scoundrel.

Nevertheless, the results of the check, most likely, turned out to be objective, since Potapov was reinstated in the rank of major general and returned to army service. Mikhail Ivanovich wrote an application for reinstatement in the party. And again, Zhukov came to the rescue, who gave the following recommendation to his long-time ally: “As for commanding qualities, Comrade Potapov was the best army commander, and the units and formations he commanded were always leading. In the border battle, the 5th Army fought with exceptional tenacity and valor. Retreating under the influence of superior enemy forces, she repeatedly counterattacked and defeated the Germans. Comrade Potapov led the army brilliantly. I will also say that he was a man of great soul, whom all subordinates loved for his benevolence and understanding. It is difficult to read these lines from an official document without emotion, which came from the pen of a marshal who was far from sentimental.

Obviously, Zhukov's opinion was shared by many in the political and military leadership of the USSR. In any case, Mikhail Ivanovich turned out to be, probably, the only one of the highest Soviet officers who was captured, who not only returned to the army, but also made, if not enchanting, but, given the vicissitudes of our post-war history, quite a worthy career. He served in Transbaikalia, on Far East, death caught Colonel-General Potapov in January 1965 in the post of first deputy commander of the troops of the Odessa military district.

The place of Mikhail Ivanovich Potapov in the peculiar hierarchy of military leaders of the Great Patriotic War, built in postwar period, clearly does not correspond to his military talent and contribution to the Victory.

But still, it cannot be said that the name of the commander of the 5th Army was hushed up. Appreciated his military leadership talent was given in post-war memoirs by the Soviet marshals I.Kh. Bagramyan, I.I. Yakubovsky, and former opponents - Guderian, Keitel, Halder. It should be noted that the 5th Army has become a real forge of personnel - such recognized commanders as M.E. Katukov, K.S. Moskalenko, K.K. Rokossovsky, I.I. Fedyuninsky. All of them highly appreciated the merits of their former commander. Even during Potapov's lifetime, A. Filippi's book "The Pripyat Problem" was published in the USSR, where the role of the 5th Army in disrupting the blitzkrieg was studied in detail.

In 1954, he again became the commander of the 5th Army, albeit without him, but which, in 1945, reached the enemy's lair. His biggest resentment against Fate was this: “I didn’t let you, villain, reach Berlin!” And his wife, Marianna Feodorovna, answered: “Thank God that he remained alive!” "Do not understand!" the stern general was angry.
He passed away on January 26, 1965 from a heart attack - in the rank of colonel general, in the post of 1st deputy commander of the Odessa military district. Streets in Kyiv, Lutsk, Vladimir-Volynsky were named after him.

The article was published as part of a socially significant project implemented with state support allocated as a grant in accordance with the order of the President Russian Federation No. 11-rp dated 01/17/2014 and on the basis of a competition held by the All-Russian public organization Society "Knowledge" of Russia.

Maxim Zarezin

Commander Mikhail Potapov

One should not be surprised at the Fuhrer's persistence - he saw the same maps of hostilities that we see now, and quite adequately perceived the threat posed by the activity of the troops under the command of Potapov.

Finally, on August 21, Hitler issues an order in which he repeats three times (!) the idea of the need to destroy the 5th Army. But the main thing is that for the first time he is ready to allocate "as many divisions as necessary" to carry out this task. Along with the success of the operation to blockade Leningrad, the Fuhrer considers the defeat of Potapov's army among the prerequisites for a successful offensive "against the Timoshenko group of troops", that is, the Western Front. It turns out that the way to Moscow, according to Hitler, lay through the defeated 5th Army.

I learned all these details later, but when I examined the map, the name Potapov, alas, did not tell me anything. Gradually, after getting acquainted with documents and studies, conversations with the widow of the commander, Marianna Fedorovna Modorova, the amazing life path of this person was revealed to me.

From deacons to generals

Without leaving the limits of the parish, Mikhail received a very decent primary education for a village boy. In a rural school, his teacher was the "easier" prince from the Gagarin family, later he studied at a parish school at a church in the neighboring village of Putogino. The St. Petersburg millionaire book publisher, a native of these places, Ignatius Tuzov, acted as a trustee of the temple and the school, so, for sure, they cared about the level of knowledge of the students here.

The First World War and the economic crisis did not have the best effect on the Potapov family well-being. As a teenager, Mikhail began to help his father. The Potapovs met the October Revolution in Kharkov, where they worked as bridgemen in a tram depot.

When in June 1939 Zhukov was offered to head the operation against the Japanese army at Khalkhin Gol, he insisted on appointing Potapov as his deputy.

Blitzkrieg failed.

I will note such a detail: in these days of fierce confrontation, namely on June 30, Potapov issued an order in which he pointed out the inadmissibility of shooting prisoners of war.

Army General S.M. Shtemenko wrote: "The 5th Army ... became, as they say, a thorn in the eye of the Nazi generals, put up strong resistance to the enemy and inflicted significant damage on him."

Shtemenko, in those months one of the leading employees of the Operational Directorate of the General Staff of the Red Army, had in mind the successful counteroffensive of the 5th Army, undertaken on July 10. Then Potapov's tankers, behind the backs of the formations of the III Army Corps, intercepted the Novograd-Volynsky - Zhytomyr highway at a width of over 10 km. What a headache for the Germans was the loss of this most important communication can be judged by the fact that the commander of the Army Group "South" Gerd von Runstedt seriously planned to use aviation to transfer the infantry regiment "Hermann Goering" to the Zhytomyr region.

While Potapov's troops attacked the northern flank of the German offensive, the defenders of Kyiv got a breather. The command of the 6th German Army was forced to declare: "The nature of the threat to our troops from the main forces of the 5th Russian Army is still such that this threat should be eliminated before the attack on Kyiv." The loss of the Ukrainian capital was postponed for two months.

fatal triumph?

In fact, in the 20s of August 1941, the question was not so categorical: either to Moscow or to Ukraine. The operation against Potapov's troops was conceived by the Fuhrer as an auxiliary one precisely within the framework of the Wehrmacht's decisive offensive against the capital of the USSR.

Chronicle of the disaster

On the evening of September 5, Potapov again turned to the front commander Kirponos on the HF with a proposal to withdraw troops, but received a categorical refusal. It is noteworthy that it was on this day, according to Halder's notes, that Hitler first spoke about the Kiev cauldron. Only on September 9, the Headquarters authorized the withdrawal of the 5th Army to the Desna River. By this time, Potapov's main forces were securely surrounded. From the entire army of 70 thousand personnel, less than 4 thousand fighters remained, as well as about 200 guns and mortars of various systems.

Potapov's documents were handed over to Kirill Semenovich Moskalenko, the future marshal, and then the commander of the 15th Rifle Corps of the 5th Army. “I literally sobbed when they handed over the documents of our army commander to me. I didn’t know at all what would happen to us now, since Mikhail Ivanovich died.”

The bitter fate of the commander

The victorious spring of the 45th, Mikhail Ivanovich met in the "general's" camp Hammelburg. On April 22, American troops came close to them. The camp commandant went with a white flag to Patton's army. The Americans arrived at the camp and transported all the prisoners to their place, then they transferred them to the French, and the recent prisoners of war returned home from Paris.

However, the homeland met them unkindly. Literally from the gangway of the plane, Potapov and his comrades were sent to the "object" in Golitsino near Moscow. A special check took place for seven months, which left indelible marks in the soul of Mikhail Ivanovich.

Until the end of his life, the invariably balanced and witty Potapov grew gloomy and closed at the mention of the name of the former SMERSH chief Abakumov, whom he considered a rare scoundrel.

Nevertheless, the results of the check, most likely, turned out to be objective, since Potapov was reinstated in the rank of major general and returned to army service. Mikhail Ivanovich wrote an application for reinstatement in the party. And again, Zhukov came to the rescue, who gave the following recommendation to his long-time ally: “As for commanding qualities, Comrade Potapov was the best army commander, and the units and formations he commanded were always leading. In the border battle, the 5th Army fought with exceptional tenacity and valor. Retreating under the influence of superior enemy forces, she repeatedly counterattacked and defeated the Germans. Comrade Potapov led the army brilliantly. I will also say that he was a man of great soul, whom all subordinates loved for his benevolence and understanding. It is difficult to read these lines from an official document without excitement, which came from the pen of a marshal far from sentimental.

Obviously, Zhukov's opinion was shared by many in the political and military leadership of the USSR. In any case, Mikhail Ivanovich turned out to be, probably, the only one of the highest Soviet officers who was captured, who not only returned to the army, but also made, if not enchanting, but, given the vicissitudes of our post-war history, quite a worthy career. He served in Transbaikalia, in the Far East, Colonel-General Potapov died in January 1965 in the post of First Deputy Commander of the Odessa Military District.

The place of Mikhail Ivanovich Potapov in the peculiar hierarchy of military leaders of the Great Patriotic War, built in the post-war period, clearly does not correspond to his talent as a commander and contribution to the Victory.

But still, it cannot be said that the name of the commander of the 5th Army was hushed up. His military leadership talent was highly appreciated in post-war memoirs by the Soviet marshals I.Kh. Bagramyan, I.I. Yakubovsky, and former opponents - Guderian, Keitel, Halder. It should be noted that the 5th Army has become a real forge of personnel - such recognized commanders as M.E. Katukov, K.S. Moskalenko, K.K. Rokossovsky, I.I. Fedyuninsky. All of them highly appreciated the merits of their former commander. Even during Potapov's lifetime, A. Filippi's book "The Pripyat Problem" was published in the USSR, where the role of the 5th Army in disrupting the blitzkrieg was studied in detail.
And yet, the name of Potapov over the past 70 years after the victorious May 45 did not become public knowledge. So, today the memory of Mikhail Ivanovich is immortalized only in Ukraine, where streets in Kyiv and Zhitomir are named after him. How long? I think it's an anniversary Great Victory- a worthy occasion for Russians to appreciate the merits of a wonderful commander and patriot of our Motherland.

The article was published as part of a socially significant project implemented with state support funds allocated as a grant in accordance with the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 11-rp dated January 17, 2014 and on the basis of a competition held by the All-Russian public organization Society "Knowledge" of Russia.

1. The general meeting of participants in the Vostok production cooperative, taking into account the need to bring the organizational and legal form of the enterprise in line with the legislation of the Russian Federation, decided to reorganize it into a limited liability company. When approving the text of the constituent agreement and the charter of the company, the legal adviser Zadorov pointed out the need to remove from the charter the reasons for dismissal that are not provided for by labor legislation. Objecting to Zadorov, the chairman of the cooperative, Rokotov, referred to the fact that the charter of the society enshrined the grounds for expelling any member from its membership.

Determine the sectoral nature of labor relations of members of cooperative organizations, employees - participants of non-state enterprises in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation. Describe the features of the content of labor relations of the relevant types.

2. On behalf of the brigade, Potapov entered into an agreement with the administration of the Avangard stadium, in accordance with which the brigade undertakes to put the football field in full order within three months, and the administration to pay for the work after it is completed.

After three months, during the calculation, the workers of the brigade demanded that they also be paid compensation for unused vacation in proportion to the hours worked.

Is this requirement to be met? What type of labor contract was entered into?

3. Sergeev refused to sign a contract with a branch of the Beryozka closed joint-stock company, demanding that not the branch, but the joint-stock company as a whole, be indicated as the employer. He believed that only in this case he acquires the right to receive additional social benefits stipulated in the contract. The head of the branch explained to Sergeyev that the separate structural subdivisions to which the branch belongs have the right to conclude civil law and labor contracts.

Analyze the legal status of a separate structural unit in terms of civil and labor legal personality.

4. Do the following situations comply with the labor legislation of the Russian Federation:

a) 14-year-old Akulov went to work as a courier during the summer holidays at school. However, at the request of the parents, the employment contract with Akulov was terminated, since they did not give their consent to the employment of their son;

b) The mayor of the city made a decision prohibiting the leaders of the organization to hire teenagers who do not have a complete secondary education;

c) Underage Volin entered into an oral agreement with his neighbors on the cultivation of seedlings, which he later wanted to sell in bulk;

d) Khalilova was denied a part-time job on the grounds that she was already working as a part-time job in another organization;

e) Engineer Goberidze was not hired by the state unitary enterprise, since the head of the relevant department is Goberidze's stepfather;

f) Storekeeper Zhuchkin, who was declared legally incompetent by the court, was fired from his job for stealing an expensive tool.

5. One of the nightclubs in the city of Orion, by agreement with young people, prepared croupiers at his own expense for work in his establishment. However, having received professional knowledge and skills, having worked for a short time, the newly minted croupiers were fired from Orion.

What are the rights and obligations of the employer and employee in this situation?

6.Determine the grounds for the emergence of the following individual labor relations if the employee is known to be:

a) General Director of JSC;

b) a professor at a state university;

c) director of a state unitary enterprise;

d) the chairman of the city court;

e) Dean of the Faculty of ASTU;

f) a member of a professional basketball team.

7. Citizen Kuznetsov came to the lawyer's office and asked him to explain whether he was considered hired and whether he could demand a work book. Kuznetsov explained that he works at Pirozhok LLC as a loader, he signed an agreement called the “Contract Work Agreement”, according to which he comes to work by eight o'clock every day, except Saturday and Sunday. His working day lasts nine hours, during the day he performs loading and unloading work in the bakery as the need arises, while reporting to the director of the LLC.

In the role of a lawyer, give a reasoned answer to citizen Kuznetsov.

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

"Altai State University"

PLANS OF SEMINAR AND PRACTICAL STUDIES

by discipline: labor law

Barnaul 2011

Plans for seminars and practical classes of the academic discipline were developed by PhD in Law, Associate Professor, PhD in Law, Associate Professor, PhD in Law, Associate Professor on the basis of:

1) SES VPO in the direction of training: 030600.62 "Jurisprudence", approved by the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation on March 27, 2000

2) State Educational Standard of Higher Professional Education in the specialty: 030501.65 "Jurisprudence", approved by the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation on March 27, 2000

Plans of seminars and practical classes academic discipline approved at a meeting of the Department of Labor, Environmental Law and Civil Procedure.

dated "___" ______________ 2011, protocol No. _______

Head of Department _______________________________

The plans of seminars and practical classes of the academic discipline were approved at a meeting of the Methodological Commission of the Faculty of Law of AltSU

dated "___" ________ 20__, protocol No. ___

Chairman of the methodological commission _________________________

Signed for printing Format 60*90/16

Paper for duplicators Offset printing

Conv. oven l. Circulation

Laboratory of copying equipment of the law faculty of the Altai State University.

656099. Barna.

INTRODUCTION

The global changes in political, social, and economic life that are currently taking place in Russia have had a significant impact on the regulation of labor relations. They entailed new approaches to the established concepts of labor law, as well as to its individual institutions. This was reflected in the Labor Code of the Russian Federation adopted on December 21, 2001 by the State Duma. However, the code was not free from shortcomings, and the practice of application showed many of its shortcomings. In this regard, on June 30, 2006, the Federal Law “On Amendments to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, Recognition of Certain Normative Legal Acts of the USSR as Invalid on the Territory of the Russian Federation and Repealed Some Legislative Acts (Provisions of Legislative Acts) of the Russian Federation” was adopted, which introduced significant changes to regulation of labor relations.

c) Underage Volin entered into an oral agreement with his neighbors on the cultivation of seedlings, which he later wanted to sell in bulk;

d) Khalilova was denied a part-time job on the grounds that she was already working as a part-time job in another organization;

e) Engineer Goberidze was not hired by the state unitary enterprise, since the head of the relevant department is Goberidze's stepfather;

f) Storekeeper Zhuchkin, who was declared legally incompetent by the court, was fired from his job for stealing an expensive tool.

5. Protection of the rights of trade unions.

6. Other representatives of employees in labor relations.

Regulations:

1. On the protection of the rights of representatives of workers at the enterprise and the opportunities provided to them: ILO Convention of 01.01.01 No. 000 // Conventions and recommendations adopted by the International Labor Conference. 1T. II.- Geneva : International Labor Office, 1991.

2. On the protection of the rights of representatives of workers in the enterprise: ILO Recommendation 1971 No. 000 // Conventions and recommendations adopted by the International Labor Conference. 1T. II.- Geneva: International Labor Office, 1991.

3. On insolvency (bankruptcy): Federal Law of 01.01.01 (as amended on 01.01.2001) // SZ RF. - 2002. - No. 43. - Art. 4190.

4. On trade unions, their rights and guarantees of their activities: Federal Law of December 8, 1995 (as amended on 01.01.2001) // SZ RF. - 1996. - No. 3. - Art. 148.

2. Released from prison Shishkin, expelled from the 9th grade of the secondary school Svistunov and disabled 3 gr. Kurochkin decided to go to work. After applying for assistance to the employment authorities, they were all sent to the plant. Kurochkin and Svistunov applied for the positions of couriers, Shishkin - for the head of the shop. The head of the personnel department of the plant, having familiarized himself with the submitted documents, refused to hire them, citing the fact that; Svistunov is a minor and it is unprofitable for the plant to hire him; Kurochkin is disabled, and therefore will not be able to cope with the work of a courier; Shishkin was released from prison and it is unlikely that the shop workers will want to work under his leadership. In addition, according to the job description, the head of the shop must have a higher technical education, while Shishkin has a special secondary. To the arguments of the applicants that they were sent by the employment service and therefore they must be hired, the head of the personnel department stated that the enterprise is private and therefore, in conditions of complete economic independence, the directions given by the employment service for employment are not binding on the employer.

3. Karasev applied to the court with a claim for compulsion to conclude an employment contract, recovery of compensation for non-pecuniary damage. In support of the stated requirements, he indicated that from the advertisement placed in the newspaper, he became aware that a driver was required in the specified company. When contacting for employment, they took his documents and asked him to come in two days. When Karasev arrived at the appointed time, he was denied employment. On the demand to motivate the refusal, the plaintiff was verbally explained that he was refused due to the lack of the necessary work experience, and also due to the fact that he did not provide a medical certificate of health. In addition, the Head of Human Resources called former place Karasev's work, and there they spoke of him as an irresponsible worker, which also influenced the decision to refuse. In the statement of claim, Karasev asks to oblige the defendant to conclude an employment contract with him and recover compensation for non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 5,000 rubles, since, according to the plaintiff, there was discrimination on the part of the defendant, which is expressed in the presentation additional requirements to persons applying for the position of a driver in terms of the requirements for the length of service.

Is Karasev rightfully denied the conclusion of an employment contract? Are his demands to be met?

Give a qualified assessment of the situation. What demands can Mitrokhina make if she decides to go to court?

6. Merchandiser Zhdanova went on parental leave for a year. In her place, Vlasov was accepted, with whom a fixed-term employment contract was concluded for one year. After a year, Vlasov was fired under paragraph 2 of Art. 77 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. Disagreeing with the dismissal, Vlasov filed a lawsuit for reinstatement, referring to the fact that Zhdanova never left the parental leave.

How should this case be decided?

7. Kolevatova was hired as a storekeeper, but no employment contract was signed with her. According to the provisions of the order to enroll her, the employee was given a one-month probationary period with a salary of 8,000 rubles. After passing the probationary period, they promised to increase the salary. Four weeks after the start of work, the store manager, inspecting the warehouse, pointed out to Kolevatova that her workplace was in disarray, the boxes were stacked sloppily, blocking the aisles. To this remark, Kolevatova replied that she was not given ancillary workers, and it was not her responsibility to carry boxes, and she was pregnant. A week after the conversation, Kolevatova was fired as having failed the test.

Assess the legitimacy of the employer's actions.

8. Ignatov applied to the store for a job as a food salesman. The following documents were demanded from him: 1) a passport; 2) work book; 3) military ID; 4) diploma of higher education; 5) an insurance certificate of compulsory pension insurance; 6) TIN; 7) reference from the previous place of work; 8) certificate of registration at the place of residence; 9) a medical certificate from a polyclinic on the state of health.

Are these claims correct?

9. When concluding an employment contract with Ivanova on work as the head of the sales department, the director proposed to include the following conditions in the employment contract: on the establishment of a probationary period; on the termination of the employment contract if Ivanova refuses to go on a business trip; Ivanova's commitment not to become pregnant for the next three years; not work part-time for another employer; on non-disclosure of trade secrets. Ivanova signed the contract on the proposed terms.

Are the terms of the employment contract correct?What are the consequences of including conditions in an employment contract that are contrary to labor law?

10. On June 20, 2009, the employment contract with the head of the supply department, Kireev, was terminated in connection with the call to military service. Kabanov was taken in his place. After the end of his service life, Kireev returned to the plant and demanded that he be given his former position. The administration refused him this. Kireev appealed to the court.

How to resolve this dispute?

Lessons 11-12

Subject: Changing the employment contract

1. The concept and grounds for changing the employment contract.

2. The concept of transfer to another job. The difference between transferring to another job and moving. Classification of translations.

3. Changing the terms of the employment contract determined by the parties for reasons related to changes in organizational or technological working conditions.

4. Labor relations in the event of a change in the owner of the organization, a change in the jurisdiction of the organization.

5. Suspension from work.

Regulations:

1. On employment in the Russian Federation: Law of the Russian Federation dated 01.01.2001 No. 000-1 (as amended on 01.01.2001) // SZ RF. - 1996. - No. 17. - Art. 1915.

Literature:

1. Bugrov determined by the parties of the terms of the employment contract for reasons related to changes in organizational or technological conditions // Labor Law. - 2007. - No. 3.

2. Bugrov and general modern rules for transfers to another job // Labor in Russia and abroad. - 2011. - No. 4.

3. Bugrov labor contract // Russian legal journal. - 2009. - No. 1.

4. Ivanov, the terms of the employment contract on the place of work: the ratio of the provisions of Article 74 with Articles 72.1 and 81 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation // Labor Law. - 2010. - No. 9.

5. Kostyan of the owner of the property of the organization: legal consequences for the parties to the employment contract // Labor disputes. - 2008. - No. 4.

6. Suspension from work as a way to protect the interests of the employer // Legitimacy. - 2011. - No. 9.

7. Petrov of the employment contract: issues of theory and practice, improvement of chapter 12 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation // Legislation and Economics. - 2009. - No. 5.

8. On the regulation of temporary transfer to another job by agreement of the parties // Journal of Russian law. - 2011. - No. 3.

9. Tikhomirov for another job and other changes in working conditions: A practical guide. M., 2009.

10. Khnykin changes in the employment contract // Legislation. - 2009. - No. 1.

11., Tsypkina contract: the procedure for concluding, changing and terminating / ed. . 3rd ed., revised. and additional M., 2008.

12. Changing the terms of the employment contract (transfer to another job, relocation) // Economy and law. - 2009. - No. 9.

Tasks:

1. Leontiev, accepted into the Alla company as a Ford driver, by order of the deputy. The director of the company was transferred to a Mitsubishi minibus. Leontiev disagreed with the transfer because the minibus was out of order and went on strike. He spent a whole week in the director's office, never showing up at his workplace. For refusal to perform work and a long absence from the workplace, he was fired for absenteeism. Leontyev applied to the court with a request to reinstate him at work as a driver of a passenger car, to recover wages for the time of forced absenteeism and to compensate for moral damage.

Solve the case.

2. Karavaeva filed a lawsuit in court to declare the translation illegal and to compensate for non-pecuniary damage. In the statement of claim, she indicated that as a result of the transfer from gas station No. 5 to gas station No. 8, the terms of the employment contract were violated, since her work volume decreased, since fuel sales at gas station No. 8 were small, and this, in turn, affected the salary - he has shrunk. In addition, she receives a monthly bonus for professional excellence of 15%, while during the period of work at gas station No. 5 this bonus was charged at a rate of 30%. Also, gas station number 8 is too far from her home, and she has to get to and from work for two hours. In court, the defendant's representative explained that the terms of the employment contract were not violated, since it provides for the right of the employer to move the employee from one gas station to another without his consent. When Karavaeva was moved, her functional duties did not change, the terms of the contract were not violated, since the allowances are not included in the mandatory terms of the employment contract.

Solve the case.

3. Upon joining Terem LLC, the seller Sidorov, who has an economic education, agreed to include in the employment contract a condition that, if necessary, he can be transferred by order of the director to any job requiring economic knowledge, for any period. After 4 months, Sidorov was transferred to the position of an accountant for the period of the latter's illness. A month after the transfer, Sidorov wrote an application addressed to the director with a request to return him to his previous place of work, since he does not have sufficient experience and knowledge to properly perform the duties of an accountant. The director refused the request, citing an employment contract. Then Sidorov promised to go to court with a lawsuit to declare the transfer illegal, since he did not sign a separate written agreement on the transfer. To which the director objected that Sidorov had voluntarily assumed the duties of an accountant, thereby expressing his consent to the transfer.

4. Golovina worked at a garment factory as a seamstress-minder. On April 30, she received a conclusion from the medical advisory commission that her work was contraindicated for her health reasons. In connection with this conclusion, Golovina was transferred without her consent to work on the numbering of the cut. Since she did not start this work, she was fired from work under paragraph 3 of Art. 81 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. Golovina went to court with a lawsuit to reinstate her at work as a seamstress-mechanic.

What decision should the court make?

5. Is the current labor legislation observed in the following transfers made without the consent of the employees:

Due to severe frosts in the village of Kerchevo, there was a threat of damage to the heating system of public utilities, in connection with this, the plumber of Bytsnab JSC Nikolaev was transferred for 10 days as a plumber to the municipal repair and construction department;

Sanko, a carpenter of the 5th category of the motor depot, was transferred for three weeks as a spare parts distributor with the wording "to prevent damage to spare parts";

Accountant Seregina was transferred as a temporary replacement to the position of a sick chief accountant for a period of 1 month.

6. Nikolaeva has worked in a budgetary institution as a chief accountant since March 2007. Upon admission to work, a probationary period of 6 months was set, while the employment contract was concluded for an indefinite period. In May 2011, a new structure of the institution was approved. As a result, the name of the structural unit where Nikolaeva worked has changed: from “accounting” to “accounting and control sector”. The name of the position has also changed - “Head of the Sector accounting and control." In this regard, Nikolaeva received an offer to conclude a new employment contract with a request to write an application for transfer to the position of head of the accounting and control sector. The proposal also stated that, in accordance with Art. 74 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, she has the right to refuse to work in the new conditions. In the new employment contract provided for review, it was stipulated that it was concluded for 1 year, and that a probationary period of 6 months was established. It also followed from the terms of the contract that there was an increase in duties, official salary and wages.

7. Ledneva worked as a specialist of the second category in the branch of the State Unitary Enterprise "Housing and Communal Services". By order of the relevant state body, the functions of the housing and communal services of this branch were transferred to the jurisdiction. Also, the order indicated that it was obliged to accept the transfer of employees of the branch of the State Unitary Enterprise "Housing and Communal Services". Since she was not in the position of a specialist of the second category, Ledneva was acquainted with the warning about the possible termination of the employment contract in connection with the change of ownership of the organization's property. At the same time, she was offered a job as a janitor in office space, which she turned down. By order of the director of the branch of the State Unitary Enterprise "Housing and Communal Services" Ledneva was dismissed under paragraph 6 of part 1 of Art. 77 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation.

Was Ledneva rightfully fired?

8. Klepikov, driving a private car outside working hours, was deprived of a driver's license for driving a vehicle without state registration plates for a period of 1 month. In this regard, the director of the organization where Klepikov worked as a driver issued an order to transfer him to a laborer for up to 1 month so that Klepikov would not have downtime, referring to Part 3 of Art. 72.2 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. Klepikov refused to transfer and did not go to work, for which he was fired from work for absenteeism.

Decide on the legitimacy of the actions of Klepikov and the CEO.

Questions about employment law:

1. The concept of labor, its role in the life of society. Social organization of labor. general characteristics relationships that arise in the course of work.

2. The concept and subject of labor law.

3. Method of labor law: concept and features.

4. The system of labor law.

5. Place of labor law in the general system of law. Trends in the development of labor law.

6. Functions of labor law.

7The concept and meaning of the basic principles of labor law. Formulation, system, content and concretization of the basic principles of labor law.

8. The concept and types of sources of labor law.

9. Features of the system of sources of labor law.

10. General characteristics of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation as the main source of labor law.

11. Unity and differentiation of labor law norms.

12. Local regulations in the system of sources of labor law.

13. The role of judicial acts on the regulation of labor relations.

14. The concept of an individual labor relationship, unlike related relations related to labor.

15. Subjects of an individual labor relationship.

17. Grounds for the emergence, change and termination of an individual labor relationship.

18. Legislation on the rights and guarantees of the activities of trade unions.

19. The right of trade unions to represent the interests of workers, to conduct collective bargaining, conclude collective agreements and agreements.

20. The protective function of trade unions and the main directions of its implementation.

21. Basic rights in the field of labor protection.

22. Protection of the rights of trade unions.

23. Other representatives of employees in labor relations.

24. The concept, meaning and basic principles of social partnership in the sphere of work.

25. Parties and bodies of social partnership.

26. System and forms of social partnerships.

27. Collective agreement: parties, content, procedure for concluding, changing and terminating.

28. Agreement: concept, types, features of acceptance and action.

29. Control over the implementation of collective agreements and agreements. Responsibility of subjects of social partnership.

30. The concept and meaning of the employment contract. Its difference from related contracts related to labor.

32. Types of employment contracts. Fixed-term employment contract.

33. Conclusion and execution of an employment contract.

34. Test when applying for a job.

35. Labor books.

36. The concept and grounds for changing the employment contract.

37. The concept of transfer to another job. The difference between transferring to another job and moving. Classification of translations.

38. Changing the terms of the employment contract determined by the parties for reasons related to changes in organizational or technological working conditions.

39. Labor relations when changing the owner of the organization, changing the jurisdiction of the organization.

40. Suspension from work.

41. General characteristics of the grounds for termination of the employment contract, their classification.

42. Termination of the employment contract at the initiative of the employee.

43. Termination of an employment contract at the initiative of the employer on grounds not related to the guilty actions of the employee: grounds and procedure.

44. Termination of an employment contract at the initiative of the employer on grounds related to the guilty actions of the employee: grounds and procedure.

45. Termination of an employment contract due to circumstances beyond the control of the parties, as well as due to violation of the established rules for concluding an employment contract.

46. The procedure for registration of dismissal and calculation.

47. Legal consequences of illegal transfer and dismissal.

ABOUT THE HOUSE AS A STRUCTURE AND ITS HISTORY IN THE HEROIC CHRONICLE OF THE DEFENSE OF SEVASTOPOL
The building itself in historical sources and memoirs is referred to as the house of a road foreman.
It is located one kilometer south of the Mekenzi cordon N 1. Nowadays, it can be seen driving along the highway at the entrance to Inkerman at the top on the left side of the road. During the war, this house among the defenders of Sevastopol began to be called Potapov's house. Why the house got such a name, why it is remarkable, what it is known for and how it is connected with the history of Sevastopol, I will try to explain further on the topic in detail. And I’ll start with a story about a man, in honor of whom during the war years during his lifetime the house received such a name.
This is how the house looks today.
View from the highway at the entrance to Inkerman, in front of the Mir-Mir railway bridge.
The photo was taken on February 6, 2015.
ALEXEY STEPANOVICH POTAPOV
EXTRACTS FROM THE BOOK OF KRYLOV N.I. - "NEVER FADE OUT"
From the chapter - "Fighting Near Odessa"

Courage and steadfastness were shown in the defense of Odessa by three regiments and six detachments of marines, one of which was commanded by the future commander of the famous marine units, Major A.S. Potapov, awarded the Order of Lenin.
Serebrov's regiment fought to restore positions in the Vygoda area. A detachment of sailors unanimously went on the attack, knocked out the enemy from one farm, but could not connect with the battalion advancing to the right, on the other side of the railway (this was envisaged to encircle the enemy units entrenched here). The sailors, however, managed to break through further into the enemy rear. The detachment was cut off from its own and was found only the next day.
"... - They dragged a decent amount of captured weapons," General Vorobyov reported. Of course, they suffered losses. The commander was wounded in the arm. He scolded for partisanship, but obviously someone should be presented for a reward ... Major A. S. Potapov, a former teacher at one of the naval schools and the future commander of the 79th rifle brigade, which became famous during the defense of Sevastopol ... "
MEMOIRS OF THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE EVENTS

Near Sevastopol, on December 20, it was necessary to hastily create a barrier at a reserve line near the Eastern Inkerman Lighthouse, which had never before been mentioned in operational reports - less than four kilometers from the North Bay. Anti-aircraft batteries removed from their positions were advanced to the Martynovsky ravine as anti-tank batteries with the strictest order not to open fire on aircraft, so as not to reveal themselves prematurely.
So the 79th Naval Rifle Brigade, numbering about four thousand fighters, arrived to defend Sevastopol. One third of them were sailors. It was one of the brigades that, by decision State Committee Defense, adopted in October 1941, were formed from personnel Navy(sometimes completely, and sometimes, as in this case, only with a "layer" of sailors) for military operations on land fronts. This unit has always remained in the Primorsky Army as the personification of the combat brotherhood of sailors and soldiers, land and naval commanders. The brigade was commanded by Colonel Aleksey Stepanovich Potapov, known to the Primorye people in Odessa. There, while still in the rank of major, he led the first detachment of volunteer sailors sent from Sevastopol, with whom, during heated battles, he broke into the enemy rear and made a daring raid on them at his own peril and risk, causing considerable commotion in the enemy camp. For such partisanship, he deserved a strict reprimand, but he was also worthy of a reward for the damage inflicted on the enemy. And I must say, I got both. In that sortie, the nature of Potapov was clearly manifested - the commander is not very prudent, carried away, but bold, decisive, capable of going ahead with faith in success.
The 79th brigade was supposed to participate in the Kerch-Feodosia landing operation as part of the 44th army of the Transcaucasian Front and was intended for the first throw to Feodosia, to capture the port. Not having the right to declare this to their subordinates until the last moment (which never came), Potapov and Slesarev nevertheless managed to prepare the brigade as a shock unit, where all the personnel believed that they would perform some particularly important task. With this internal charge, the Potapovites - as they called themselves - arrived in Sevastopol. Commander Petrov immediately noticed and appreciated the high fighting spirit of this unit.
Meeting with A. S. Potapov, with the chief of staff, Major I. A. Morozov and other brigade commanders a little later, I also could not help but feel their fighting spirit. The impression was made by the general conviction of the commanding staff that the brigade fighters were heroes-heroes who could handle any task. Potapov, like most of the commanders around him, was in naval uniform. From Odessa, Alexei Stepanovich left a memo: his left hand did not move well. Potapov now looked five years older. Obviously, the hospital, where he hardly spent the prescribed time, and the responsibility for the entrusted large part, left their mark. And he understood, of course, that since the brigade was removed from the operation for which it was specially preparing, and they were hastily transferred here, then, therefore, expect an even more difficult task.
In some works on the defense of Sevastopol, one can read that Potapov's brigade immediately after landing, almost straight from the berths, launched a counterattack. But what was not, was not. Despite the seriousness of the situation, we nevertheless managed without throwing precious reinforcements into battle without the elementary necessary preparation. It is true, however, that the battalions of the 79th brigade immediately began to advance towards their starting positions, from which, together with other units, they were to counterattack the enemy the next morning.
Under the command post, the brigades took a house a kilometer south of the Mekenzie No. 1 cordon, next to the advanced army observation post. Somehow, they immediately began to call it Potapov's house.
As evidenced by the combat log, in this house at 18:45 on December 21, the commander gave Colonel Potapov the first combat order: by 6.00 on the 22nd, concentrate the brigade in the area of the Mekenzie cordon station Mekenzievy Gory and be ready to attack the enemy by 8.00.
ALEXEY STEPANOVICH POTAPOV

Winter days are short.
There was no light time left for reconnaissance, but guides who knew the area well were given to each company of the brigade. At 0200, the planning of the morning counterattack ended. The documents remind us that at that time we called it a counterattack. In the event of complete success, it could end in the defeat of the Kamyshlov grouping of the enemy - units that had penetrated our defenses in the area of the Kamyshlov ravine. But the most important thing was to regain the positions on the main defensive line, lost the day before.
Potapov's brigade, of course, was considered as the main striking force. To the right of it, the 287th regiment of the Chapaev division was to advance, to the left of the two regiments of the 388th. Special attention was paid to the preparation of the latter. Operational workers and political departments spent the night in their units, trying to cheer up the people. Having suffered significant losses, Ovseenko's division still had no fewer bayonets than the fresh 79th brigade. How could they not take it into account? In addition, its two regiments were not tasked with recapturing the previous positions with their own forces alone, it was only necessary to support the Potapovtsev. However, the counterattack did not actually begin in the sector of these two regiments. The enemy resumed the offensive here earlier.
The position of the front beyond the North Bay became even more dependent on the Potapov brigade. Only its strike on the flank of the Kamyshlov grouping could prevent a new enemy breakthrough, much more dangerous than yesterday. Fortunately, the first impressions of the 79th brigade were fully justified. In the oncoming battle, with which she had to start, she overpowered, crushed the onslaught of the enemy with her pressure. And, developing success, expanding the front of the counterattack during the battle, moved forward in two echelons - along the highway to Belbek.
Cohesive, confidently managed, the 79th brigade showed itself perfectly on the very first day of participation in the battles. But to truly rejoice at its success, which had already removed the threat to the Inkerman area, was hindered by what was happening to the left: after all, the Potapovites could not block the entire section of the breakthrough.
On December 23, on the seventh day from the beginning of the assault and two days after the expiration of the period that the Germans had set for themselves to take Sevastopol, there was something like a respite. Enemy attacks in different areas from Chorgun to the mouth of Belbek continued, but not at all the same as all these days - rarely where forces exceed a battalion. They were successfully repulsed both in the second sector and in the fourth, where by morning the withdrawal of our troops from the seaside ledge was completed and all the gaps formed in it were eliminated in the process of reducing the front. And on the left flank of the third sector, which now included the Potapov brigade, we again counterattacked. Here we managed to return a number of heights near the Kamyshlov ravine. But some had to be re-occupied in one day: the Potapovites, irresistible in the attack, in the throw, were not yet very able to gain a foothold on the recaptured line.
I cannot but say that the 79th brigade was extremely actively supported by the right neighbor - the 287th rifle regiment of the Chapaevites. On this day, his commander, Lieutenant Colonel N.V. Zakharov, on his own initiative, not missing a favorable moment, inflicted a strong blow to the flank of the enemy, connected with the battle with Potapovtsy, which ultimately provided the brigade and regiment with the opportunity to move forward, knock the enemy from advantageous positions. If the sector had a strong reserve, this success could be developed...
EXTRACTS FROM THE BOOK OF KRYLOV N.I. - "NEVER FADE OUT"

The news that General Petrov remains our commander was greeted at the command posts of the formations with great joy.
There is nothing to say about the army headquarters. Everything fell into place. The order for the impending attack was cancelled. The unreality of the tasks set in it had become obvious by that time.
Before occupying the station yet, the Germans became worried that the anti-aircraft gunners would not let them advance further. On December 28, our scouts intercepted a message transmitted in clear text, possibly from a mobile radio, from a car - an order: "Destroy the enemy battery at the 60 mark by strike from the air and from the ground."
In the opinion of Major Potapov, who reported the radio intercept to the army command and to me, the order could have come from Manstein himself. Measures to frustrate this plan, including to prevent the bypass of the height from the flanks, were taken. The enemy resumed the assault, concentrating units of three infantry divisions - the 22nd, 24th and 132nd - on the 9-kilometer section of the northern direction, and the 50th was soon transferred there. Major Potapov reported that, according to information received by the intelligence department, Manstein had set a new date for the capture of Sevastopol - December 28th.
On December 27, it was necessary to bring into battle all three of Guz's rifle regiments. Leaving the division under his direct control (we hoped later to bring it back to the reserve), the army commander entrusted the defense of the Mekenzievy Gory station area to it. The 345th division replaced the Vilshansky brigade, weakened by heavy losses, the Dyakonchuk regiment, of which 30 people remained, and the units attached to them, also extremely exhausted. In connection with this replacement, Ivan Efimovich and I had realized our intention, which arose for a completely different reason - to visit the North Bay together. Everything was booming there. The site and the task of each regiment of the Guz division were determined on the spot. In "Potapov's house", which fell in love with the commander, a private combat order was drawn up and signed.
There was little time left before dawn, and General Petrov would not have had time to visit all the units to which these orders concerned. But he felt the need to reinforce the formulation of the combat mission in absentia by a personal conversation with those commanders on whom much depended, to feel their mood. And although the situation did not seem to be up to meetings, the commander ordered the commanders and military commissars of the 95th and 345th divisions, as well as two rifle regiments of the last and 79th brigade, to gather in Potapov's house, which was already almost at the forefront. Together with Ivan Efimovich, General Morgunov and Captain Bezginov arrived there.
The commander ordered everyone to report in turn on the state of the units entrusted to them and the reasons for the withdrawal from the lines occupied the previous morning.
He sometimes asked unexpected questions, not in order to clarify the factual data, but such as to catch something more important from the answer: is it possible now to rely on this commander, does the person realize to what extent the fate of Sevastopol personally depends on him today, what it means to keep or not to keep, return or not return the position assigned to him? Then Petrov spoke. He sternly, with harshness, usually uncharacteristic of him, condemned the indiscretion shown by some people, the commander's incompetence, sternly warned of the consequences that, under the existing emergency circumstances, a repetition of such mistakes could cause. However, those who listened to the commander did not particularly remember this.
Most of all, I remember - not only in meaning, but in the way they were said - the hot, excited words of Ivan Efimovich that the decisive moment had come in the defense of Sevastopol, that its fate depended on the courage and stamina of our fighters and commanders, and that to withstand such an onslaught of the enemy for a long time. If we can't stand it now, the Motherland won't forgive...
One of the commanders present recorded Petrov’s final words from memory as follows:
"... There is no way back! I don't want to jump into the sea, but if we have to, we'll jump together. Just let everyone remember: we'll sit at the bottom of the sea, we'll feed the crayfish, but the cowardly, cowardly, those who couldn't stand it, we will condemn it with merciless contempt there too! .. We have no right not to stand - Sevastopol is entrusted to us, and they remember us! .. Well, my dear comrades, from the bottom of my heart I wish you good luck in battle ... "
Knowing the emotional nature of Ivan Efimovich, one can imagine how it sounded, how it should have crashed into the souls of those who, by the end of the December battles for Sevastopol, had a heavy responsibility for decisive areas of defense.
EXTRACTS FROM THE BOOK OF KRYLOV N.I. - "NEVER FADE OUT"
The commander had not yet returned to the command post when the front heard the thunderous roar of gun salvos, which seemed to come from the very center of the city. The direction of the main attack was covered by the regiments of the 95th and 845th divisions, the Potapov brigade, and the Chapaevites. The new commandant of the fourth sector, Colonel Kapitokhin, set up his command post on the southern slope of Hill 60, in the center of the decisive sector of the front.
Everything that happens before evening, and especially after dark, confirms that there are only a few hours before the assault. In front of the defense front, especially in the areas of Laskin in Potapov, the advancement of enemy infantry into the advanced trenches is noted.
The blow, as expected, was delivered beyond the Northern Bay, from Belbek and Kamyshly. The offensive there began later than in other directions, and this must be attributed to our counter-training: from the testimony of the prisoners it turned out that in the first echelon the enemy had to replace up to six battalions, which had suffered heavy losses even at the starting line. However, only the first onslaught of the enemy was delayed. Then, on a five-kilometer front, units of three German infantry divisions and about a hundred tanks entered the battle. The blow of this fist, intended to punch a gap in our defense, to pave the way for Manstein's army to the North Bay, was taken by Laskin's division and Potapov's brigade.
The positions of the 172nd Rifle Division, as well as the 79th Brigade, and the approaches to them were fortified with all the engineering means at our disposal. The natural boundaries were prudently used - the cliff of the Belbek valley and the Kamyshlov ravine with its spurs. But the system of barriers, including minefields and land mines (although more than one tank blew up on them), could not remain unscathed after so many days of artillery and aviation preparation for the assault. In a word, whether the enemy would pass or not, it was not now decided by fortifications and barriers but people. And Colonel Laskin, who did everything he could for this, did not know how the army commander would meet him when he received the order of General Petrov late in the evening of June 8 to appear together with Commissar Solontsov at Potapov's house.
FROM THE MEMORIES OF IVAN ANDREEVICH LASKIN
"... We walked with anxiety, as it was necessary to report to the commander about the trenches lost by the division ... Entering a small stone house, where a candle burned dimly, at first we did not see General Petrov, sitting in a group of commanders. And he recognized us both at once The commander listened to the report on the situation, clarified where and how much the enemy had advanced, asked about the losses. Without prejudice, we were able to say that not a single soldier left his trench without an order. Ivan Efimovich sighed deeply, somehow straightened up and he said quietly: "After all, we thought that no one from your division was left alive under such fire. And you still hold the front. This is a division!..."
EXTRACTS FROM THE BOOK OF KRYLOV N.I. - "NEVER FADE OUT"
Laskin was informed that an army reserve, the 345th division of Guz, was being pulled up to the front line that night. But the question has not yet arisen about the fact that she will not have to support the 172nd, but to replace it: the losses of the latter have not yet been fully taken into account. And the enemy wedge, which I mentioned above, began to form on the left flank of the 79th brigade, where it was pressed - at first only by a few hundred meters - by a regiment of German infantry with tanks.
The Potapovites, fighting hard on both days, mostly held their remaining positions. But there were not enough forces to restore the joint with the 172nd division, and Laskin could not help them either. Counterattacks did not yield results. In the meantime, the situation on the right flank of Potapov's brigade became more complicated: the enemy began to wedge between it and the Chapaevites. For three more days, until June 12, the situation on the entire right wing of the forward line - from the Balaklava heights to the central part of the bypass - remained stable. Everything important and decisive took place beyond the North Bay. Regardless of the losses, the Germans sought to expand their wedges, cut - the front of defense with a deep breakthrough. The commandant of the third sector was worried that he had nothing else to reinforce his left flank. The army headquarters also did not have a free reserve unit that could be put forward here. Meanwhile, the Potapov brigade, after the losses suffered during the first days of the assault, could only be considered a brigade conditionally. With its three battalions - full-blooded by the beginning of the battles, but only three! The Potapovites held back the onslaught of at least an entire infantry division with tanks for the fourth day. And this is under such artillery fire, under. such air strikes (without the support of the advancing infantry by hundreds of bombers, the Nazis would not have advanced a single step at all), that in some places the deepest trenches were eventually leveled to the ground.
The brigade did not flinch, being outflanked. Separate companies fought in the environment. And more than one battalion commander called in artillery fire on the area of \u200b\u200bhis command post - only this helped repulse the next attacks and hold out for a while at the occupied line. Potapov took care in advance that, under all conditions, the enemy could not use the exit from the Kamyshlovskaya valley - the road leading up from there and then to the Mekenzi cordon. At the former second position of the brigade, a barrier was created under the command of artillery major I. I. Kokhno: a division of anti-tank forty-fives, a company of armor-piercers and some other units. Soon this barrier was surrounded, but continued to hold on to its position, and the road remained closed to the Germans. In this situation, the growing losses of command and political personnel, especially in companies, were very disturbing.
From June 10, the command post of the 79th brigade was located in its recent rear - in the "Potapov's house", which retained this name from the December battles. The commander did not allow, but ordered to transfer it there so that the brigade commander would not lose control of his battalions. But a group of enemy tanks also broke into this area. The chief of staff, Major Sakharov, who had just established contact with us from the new command post, immediately had to lead its defense.
All that day, Guz's division and Potapov's brigade, and on the flanks - the regiments of Kapitokhin and the Chapaevs fought the most intense battles for the Mekenzievy Gory station and the Mekenzie cordon, for the heights surrounding them. Using all the possibilities of our artillery, we reached the limit of the allowable consumption of shells. All the surviving "silts" and most of the fighters flew to attack the German troops.
The lowland with the station platform and the ruins of the railway settlement changed hands three times. By the end of the day, the station was with the enemy. The enemy was stopped in the area of the Mekenzi cordon. The concave recess on the front line deepened during the day, approaching the edge of the North Bay.
EXTRACTS FROM THE BOOK OF KRYLOV N.I. - "NEVER FADE OUT"
What meant at that difficult time every day won near Sevastopol for the whole south, and maybe not only for the south, was truly realized later. But how far away Moscow is monitoring the situation on our small bridgehead, cut off from the rest of the front, how they hope for the Sevastopol people there, we felt when we read on the night of June 13 an unexpected and unusual telegram from the Headquarters, signed by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief.
Here is her text:
Vice Admiral Comrade Oktyabrsky. Major General Comrade Petrov.
I warmly welcome the valiant defenders of Sevastopol - the Red Army, Red Navy, commanders and commissars, who courageously defend every inch of Soviet land and strike at the German invaders and their Romanian henchmen. The selfless struggle of the Sevastopol people serves as an example of heroism for the entire Red Army and Soviet people. I am sure that the glorious defenders of Sevastopol will fulfill their duty to the Motherland with dignity and honor. I. Stalin.
The telegram immediately began to be transmitted to the command posts of divisions and to all units with which the army command post had direct contact. By morning, printed in a typographical way, it was delivered to all units, to the trenches of the front line.
The greeting of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief was a great moral support for all of us. And in spite of the increasingly difficult situation, the belief grew stronger that, no matter how strong the enemy, we could hold out this time. After all, the deadlines set by the German command for the capture of Sevastopol were again frustrated.
FROM THE WORK OF NEMENKO A.V. - "THE STORY OF ONE RETREAT"

Excerpt from the chapter - "Non-Combat Losses"
In Odessa, the 1st Black Sea Regiment of Marines (the future 1330th Regiment) was formed, the "underformed" 2nd Black Sea Regiment of Marines joined it. Six detachments of volunteer sailors arrived in Odessa:
1st detachment - Major A.S. Potapov (future commander of the famous naval rifle brigades - 79th and 225th), Art. political instructor S. M. Izus (1600 people)
2nd detachment - Major I. M. Denshchikov, senior political instructor Y. S. Remezov (600 people)
3rd detachment - Major P. E. Timoshenko, political instructor A. I. Kochetov (270 people)
4th detachment - Major A.I. Zhuk, future commander of the 31st Infantry Regiment, political instructor F.V. Eremeev (no data on numbers)
5th detachment - captain V.V. Spilnyak (no data on numbers); political instructor G. A. Yaroslavtsev
6th detachment - Major A.I. Shchekin, senior political instructor V.E. Zabroda (no data on numbers)
POTAPOV'S HOUSE TODAY
Throughout the post-war period, the house was residential. In it, until about 2001, people lived. Who exactly, according to what principle is unknown, but it is possible that the same linemen only of the post-war period, who worked on the maintenance of the railway tunnel. This tunnel was popularly nicknamed the “White Tunnel”, but in our time this name is remembered only by some Sevastopol residents in one way or another, by the nature of their activities, connected with the museum business, search engines or amateur historians.
After 2001, for some unknown reason, the house was abandoned, and, in fact, abandoned to the mercy of Fate and, as a result, was given for plunder to everyone. What actually happened. In a very short period of time, the house was actually savagely plundered, as they say, "from the roof to the floor." After there was practically nothing to rob and destroy, the house began to turn into an ordinary dump. The fact is that right next to the house there is an old road that existed before the Great Patriotic War and at that time it was the only more or less decent one leading to Inkerman. This road, going down to Inkerman, has several sharp turns, for which it was given the usual name for Sevastopol - serpentine.
Today, in 2015, the house is in a catastrophically terrible state. And in general, everything would be fine - you never know what is in Sevastopol in a similar form, BUT ... it’s not just a house and somehow its current state and the attitude of contemporaries towards it today, against the backdrop of those events that took place in it and its around in 1941-1942.
This is how this house looks today on the eve of the 70th anniversary of the Victory...
The photo was taken on February 6, 2015.

Attachments:
It's a sad sight, but it's what it is, and it's true.
Modern "heroes" and "real defenders of Sevastopol" take out the garbage and dump it on the territory of the house without any hesitation. And in general, the point here is not even in the house itself, but in the attitude of Sevastopol residents to their city. I will never believe that the garbage that is littered with Potapov's house and Petrov's former command post is specially brought from another city or from abroad.
About those who gave the house-monument for looting and brought it to such a state - a separate story.
I think it will soon become clear who was or is its owner, who has it on the balance sheet and who is to blame for why this happened.
I would like to believe that at least by the 70th anniversary of the Victory, at least someone will pay attention to this object.
Until then, a photo.
And as they say, no comment...

Attachments:
There is also a positive point that cannot be ignored.
Opposite Potapov's house there is a monument and it is quite well-groomed, but without pomposity and superfluous chic, in a simple way. Everything shows that people who are looking after him are simple and far from rich in terms of finances and material wealth. Moreover, around the monument is as relatively clean as for the "wild" territory, forgotten by everyone except the barbarians, and what is important at its foot is a fresh wreath and flowers.
Photo of the monument and names on it;

Attachments:
I noticed one more thing today - the old and leaky asphalt surface of the serpentine was carefully and recently removed, the road was prepared, as it seemed to me, for laying a new one. That is, they are going to restore the road, but I can’t understand whether this is good or bad.
Then, in 2001, when Potapov's House was still whole, I could not even imagine that it would be otherwise.
People lived in it and, accordingly, looked after it and the territory surrounding it. Somehow, passing by it, around August 2001, I saw that the doors were open, the windows were broken and the tiles and slate were removed from its roof and the household buildings surrounding the house. When I entered inside I saw that the floors, along with the lags, are also no longer in places. The house turned out to be abandoned and it was already almost stolen by someone for what.
On one of the walls of the facade of the building, when people were still living in the house, two commemorative plaques were fixed between two windows.
When the house was abandoned and plundered, only one of them remained on the wall - a white marble slab with an inscription in gold letters.
The second tablet was gone. Apparently it was not made of marble and was stolen like everything else in this house. What exactly and verbatim was written on it, I don’t remember right now, but the text on it was about Potapov and the heroism of his sailors during the war years in this sector of defense.
Of course, then in 2001 I removed the last remaining plate and saved it.
Vandals broke several cans of paint on its surface and it was partially damaged by its smudges, but was easily washed off afterwards with a solvent.
At the moment, it is in the funds of the Museum of the Heroic Defense and Liberation of Sevastopol safe and sound.
For those who are interested, here is a photo of her;

Attachments:
Now, by the 70th anniversary, by the anniversary, there will be a huge mass of those who "remember" .....
Yes, they have already appeared. Here are all of them, they will kick themselves in the chest, that it is thanks to them that young people are brought up in the spirit of patriotism and the history of their native land, etc .....
Here they are all, to the house, so that your "career" public figures, "patriots", started from this place.
And listen to what they promise, and later - to see ....
I still know - for the most part, they are opportunists, striving to join the "delicious pie" called money.
How I wish I was wrong.

Lessons 11-12

Regulations:

Tasks:

Attachments:

Attachments:

Attachments:

Attachments:

ecosystems

Zoology

Biology

Long 19th century

recent history

Middle Ages

new time

Interwar period