Method for determining the dominant state. Questionnaire for depersonalization by a professional system (dps) Questionnaire for dps 1 44 questions for the military

home » Interwar period Method for determining the dominant state. Questionnaire for depersonalization by a professional system (dps) Questionnaire for dps 1 44 questions for the military

Test questionnaire developed by E.F. Bazhin and others based on the J. Rotter locus of control scale

Study of subjective control

Instruction to the subject. “The questionnaire offered to you contains 44 statements. Read them and answer whether you agree with this statement or not. If you agree, put a “+” sign in front of the corresponding number in the answer sheet, if you do not agree, put a “-” sign. Remember that there are no "bad" and "good" answers in the test. Express your opinion freely and sincerely. The preferred answer is the one that comes to your mind first.

Questionnaire

1. Promotion depends more on luck than on the ability and effort of a person.

2. Most divorces are due to the fact that people did not want to adapt to each other.

3. Illness is a matter of chance, if you are destined to get sick, then nothing can be done.

4. People find themselves lonely because they themselves do not show interest and friendliness to others.

5. The fulfillment of my desires often depends on luck.

6. It is useless to make efforts in order to win the sympathy of other people.

7. External circumstances (parents, well-being) affect family happiness no less than the relationship of spouses.

8. I often feel like I have little influence on what happens to me.

9. As a rule, management is more effective when it fully controls the actions of subordinates, and does not rely on their independence.

10. My grades in school often depended on random circumstances (for example, on the mood of the teacher), and not on my own efforts.

11. When I make plans, I generally believe that I can carry them out.

12. What many people think is luck or good luck is actually the result of long, focused efforts.

13. I think that the right lifestyle can help health more than doctors and medicines.

14. If people are not suitable for each other, then no matter how hard they try, they still will not be able to establish family life.

15. The good that I do is usually appreciated by others.

16. Children grow up the way their parents raise them.

17. I think that chance or fate does not play an important role in my life.

18. I try not to plan too far ahead because a lot depends on how things turn out.

19. My grades in school depended most of all on my efforts and degree of preparedness.

20. In family conflicts, I often feel guilty for myself than for the opposite side.

21. The life of most people depends on a combination of circumstances.

22. I prefer a guide where you can decide for yourself what to do and how to do it.

23. I think that my lifestyle is in no way the cause of my illnesses.

24. As a rule, it is an unfortunate set of circumstances that prevents people from succeeding in their business.

25. In the end, the people who work in it are responsible for the poor management of the organization.

26. I often feel that I cannot change anything in the existing relationships in the family.

27. If I really want, I can win over almost anyone.

28. The rising generation is affected by so many different circumstances that the efforts of parents to educate them are often futile.

29. What happens to me is the work of my own hands.

30. It is difficult to understand why leaders act in this way and not otherwise.

31. A person who has not been able to succeed in his work, most likely, did not show enough effort.

32. More often than not, I can get what I want from my family members.

33. In the troubles and failures that were in my life, other people were more often to blame than me.

34. A child can always be protected from colds if he is monitored and dressed correctly.

35. In difficult circumstances, I prefer to wait until the problem resolves itself.

36. Success is the result of hard work and little depends on chance or luck.

37. I feel that the happiness of my family depends on me more than on anyone else.

38. It has always been difficult for me to understand why some people like me and others don't like me.

39. I always prefer to make a decision and act on my own, rather than relying on the help of other people or on fate.

40. Unfortunately, the merits of a person often remain unrecognized, despite all his efforts.

41. In family life There are situations that cannot be resolved even with the strongest desire.

42. capable people Those who failed to realize their potential should only blame themselves for this.

43. Many of my successes were only possible with the help of other people.

44. Most of the failures in my life came from inability, ignorance or laziness and depended little on luck or bad luck.

Results processing

The purpose of processing the results is to obtain an indicator of the locus of subjective control, that is, an indicator of the overall internality of "Io". It is the sum of the matches of the answers of the subject with the answers to the questions given in the key.

Analysis of results

Locus of control is a characteristic of a person's volitional sphere, which reflects his tendency to attribute responsibility for the results of his activities to external forces or to his own abilities and efforts. Attributing responsibility for the results of one's activities to external forces is called an external, or external, locus of control, and attributing responsibility to one's own abilities and efforts is called an internal, internal, locus of control.

Thus, two polar types of personalities are possible depending on the localization of control: external and internal. Each person has a certain position on a continuum that extends from the external to the internal type.

0 _______________¦______________ 44

external internal

The indicator of the locus of control (Io) obtained in the process of processing the results is deciphered as follows:

In general, the greater the value of internality, the less externality.

The locus of control characteristic of a person is universal in relation to any types of events and situations that he has to face. The same type of control manifests itself in cases of failures and in cases of achievements, and this is observed in different areas the life of the subject.

To determine the level of locus of control, the following boundaries of the internality scale are used.

At low level of internality people rarely trace the connection between their actions and life events that are significant for them. They do not consider themselves capable of controlling the development of such events and believe that most of them are the result of chance or the actions of other people. Therefore, "externals" are emotionally unstable, prone to informal communication and behavior, uncommunicative, they have poor self-control and high tension.

High level of internality corresponds to a high level of subjective control over any significant situations. People with this locus of control believe that most important events in their lives was the result of their own actions, that they can control them and feel responsible for these events, and for how their life develops in general. "Internals" with high rates of subjective control have emotional stability, perseverance, determination, are distinguished by sociability, good self-control and restraint.

Average level internalities characteristic of most people. The features of their subjective control may vary somewhat depending on whether the situation is difficult or simple, pleasant or unpleasant, etc., for a person. But although their behavior and the psychological sense of responsibility for it depend on specific social situations, it is still possible to establish the predominance of one or another type of locus of control in them.

Thus, the subjective locus of control is associated with a person's feeling of his strength, dignity, responsibility for what is happening, with self-respect, social maturity and independence of the individual. Therefore, when making recommendations for self-improvement, it should be taken into account that:

Conformal, compliant behavior is to a large extent inherent in people with an external locus of control; internals are less inclined to submit to pressure (opinion, emotions, etc.) of other people;

A person with an internal locus of control works better alone.

· internals are more actively seeking information and are usually more aware of the situation than externals;

· Internals have a more active position in relation to their health than externals.

Studies have shown that internals are more popular, occupy a favorable position in the system of interpersonal relationships. They are more benevolent, more self-confident and more tolerant.

Persons with an internal locus of control prefer non-directive methods of education and psychocorrection. And in working with externals, it is important to take care of reducing anxiety and depression that are often observed.

Methodology for studying personality self-esteem
Instruction: Carefully read the words characterizing individual personality traits (character traits):

accuracy, carelessness, thoughtfulness, susceptibility, pride, rudeness, cheerfulness, caring, envy, responsiveness, pedantry, mobility, suspicion, principledness, poetry, contempt, cordiality ,

shyness, vindictiveness, sincerity, sophistication, capriciousness, gullibility, slowness, dreaminess, suspiciousness, vindictiveness, swagger, rationality, decisiveness, self-forgetfulness, restraint, compassion, bashfulness,

· perseverance, · tenderness, · ease, · nervousness, · indecisiveness, · lack of restraint, · charm, · resentment, · caution, · patience, · cowardice, · enthusiasm, · perseverance, · compliance, · coldness, · enthusiasm.

Make two rows of words, 10-20 each.
In the first column - let's call it "My ideal" - put the words that characterize your ideal.

In the second - let's call it "Antiideal" - words denoting features that the ideal should not have.

From the first ("positive") and second ("negative") rows, select the traits that you think you have. At the same time, the choice must be made according to the “yes - no” system: do you have this feature or not, regardless of the degree of its severity.

Processing, results and conclusions

Number positive traits, which you attribute to yourself, divide by the number of words placed in the "My ideal" column. If the result is close to one, you are most likely overestimating yourself; a result close to zero indicates underestimation and increased self-criticism; with a result close to 0.5 - a normal average self-esteem, and you perceive yourself quite critically.

In the same way, conclusions are drawn based on a comparison of the selected negative qualities with the “Anti-ideal” column. Here, a result close to zero indicates an overestimated self-esteem, to one - underestimated, to 0.5 - normal.

Scales: focus on army specialties: command, operator, communications and surveillance, driver, special purpose(special forces), technological

Purpose of the test

The questionnaire is designed to study the military-professional orientation of a conscript and is a method for assessing inclinations for classes of basic similar military positions.

Instructions for the test

You are invited to perform a technique designed to determine the military-professional inclinations of a person.

Each of the statements of this technique corresponds to several answers, and your task is to, focusing mainly on your own life experience, choose the one that suits you best.

Test

1. At school I was more interested in:
1. social activity, organization of various events;
2. classes related to the implementation of calculations, diagrams, drawings;
3. classes in radio engineering and computers;
4. car business, driving, motorcycle;
5. competitions, sports;
6. labor lessons.
2. I value most in people:
1. the ability to infect and charge other people with their energy;
2. seriousness and concentration in work;
3. the ability to maintain efficiency in conditions of fatigue;
4. punctuality and accuracy;
5. courage and determination;
3. Among the various fields of activity, I am most attracted to:
1. educational and organizational work;
2. maintenance of electronic computers;
3. work related to the use of communications;
4. driving a car or other means of transport;
5. systematic sports;
6. maintenance and repair of technical devices.
4. In sports, with proper training, I would most likely achieve success as:
1. sports team coach;
2. shooter from sports weapons;
3. amateur athlete;
4. racing driver;
5. karateka, sambist, boxer;
6. mechanic in the motorcycle racing team.
5. I think that comrades value me the most:
1. adherence to principles, firmness of character;
2. perseverance and patience;
3. accuracy, diligence;
4. physical performance;
5. courage, readiness to overcome difficult and even dangerous situations;
6. ability to craft, manual creativity.
6. After serving in the army, I would prefer to work:
1. teacher or master of vocational training;
2. operator of electronic computing equipment;
3. radio operator;
4. driver (generalized machine operator);
5. tester, stuntman, mountain rescuer, bodyguard;
6. household appliances repairman.
7. I am better at activities that require a person to:
1. initiative and resourcefulness;
2. accuracy and care;
3. persistence;
4. exact implementation of instructions and prescriptions;
5. courage and willingness to take risks;
6. technical thinking.
8. I would rather read a book about:
1. outstanding commanders;
2. electronic equipment and its inventors;
3. achievements in the field of radio engineering;
4. new Vehicle Oh;
5. climbers training;
6. promising developments in electrical engineering and mechanics.
9. I find myself more capable of:
1. maintain self-control and endurance, make quick decisions in difficult, critical situations;
2. painstakingly analyze the incoming information (signals), highlight the main thing in it;
3. be extremely accurate in the performance of the tasks assigned to me;
4. overcome fatigue for a long time and maintain working capacity;
5. show determination and courage, act on the verge of risk;
6. quickly understand the features of the device of a technical device unfamiliar to me.
10. At the end of the working week, I would prefer:
1. organize a collective event with comrades;
2. systematize the materials of their collections;
3. watch a film about new achievements in the field of communications;
4. visit a car exhibition;
5. participate in a difficult and long hiking trip;
6. repair household appliances.
11. My parents (other close people) value the following in a person:
1. organizational skills;
2. endurance and patience;
3. diligence;
4. self-discipline and performance;
5. strength and courage;
6. technical literacy.
12. While serving in the army, I would like to:
1. acquire and develop organizational skills;
2. perform responsible operator work that requires self-control and endurance;
3. master the means of communication;
4. acquire (fix) the skills of driving a car and other vehicles;
5. improve your physical and volitional qualities;
6. increase the level of technical literacy.

Processing and interpretation of test results

Key to the test

Answers “a” - team specialties;
. “b” - operator;
. “c” - communications and observations;
. “d” - driver's;
. “e” - special purpose;
. “f” - technological.

Interpretation of test results

If the sum of points on any scale is 7 or more, then we can talk about the presence of an inclination (interest) in this specialty.

When needed: allows you to assess how the person being assessed relates to the events taking place in his life, whether he considers them under control or thinks that he has no power over them.

Questionnaire for the study of the level of subjective control (SCS)

Instruction: You are presented with 44 statements that describe the different ways in which a person interprets the most common social situations. Read each statement carefully, rate the extent to which you agree or disagree, and mark the answer sheet number corresponding to your choice:

3 - totally agree
+2 - agree
+1 - agree rather than disagree
-1 - Disagree rather than agree
-2 - disagree
-3 - completely disagree

Try to use the full range of ratings.

Answer sheet
_______________________________________________
Full Name

№ p/p	Statement	Grade
№ p/p	Statement
	Promotion is more about luck than personal ability and effort.
	Most divorces are due to the fact that people did not want to adapt to each other.
	Illness is a matter of chance; if you are destined to get sick, then nothing can be done
	People are lonely because they themselves do not show interest and friendliness to others.
	The fulfillment of my desires often depends on luck.
	It is useless to make an effort to win the sympathy of other people.
	External circumstances, parents and well-being affect family happiness no less than the relationship of spouses
	I often feel like I have little influence on what happens to me.
	As a rule, management is more effective when it fully controls the actions of subordinates, and does not rely on their independence.
	My grades in school depended more on random circumstances (such as the mood of the teacher) than on my own efforts.
	When I make plans, I generally believe that I can implement them
	What many people think is luck or good luck is actually the result of long, focused efforts.
	I think that the right lifestyle can help health more than doctors and medicines
	If people are not suitable for each other, then no matter how hard they try, they still will not be able to establish family life.
	The good that I do is usually appreciated by others.
	Children grow up the way their parents raise them.
	I think that chance or fate does not play an important role in my life.
	I try not to plan too far ahead because a lot depends on how things turn out.
	My grades in school depended most of all on my efforts and degree of preparedness.
	In family conflicts, I often feel guilty for myself than for the opposite side.
	People's lives depend on circumstances
	I prefer a guide where you can decide for yourself what to do and how to do it.
	I think that my lifestyle is in no way the cause of my illnesses.
	As a rule, it is an unfortunate set of circumstances that prevents people from succeeding in their business.
	In the end, the people who work in it are responsible for the poor management of the organization.
	I often feel that I can’t change anything in the existing relationships in the family.
	If I really want, I can win over anyone
	The rising generation is affected by so many different circumstances that the efforts of parents to educate them are often futile.
	What happens to me is the work of my hands
	It can be difficult to understand why leaders act the way they do.
	A person who has not been able to succeed in his work, most likely, did not show enough effort.
	More often than not, I can get what I want from my family members.
	The troubles and failures that occurred in my life were more often to blame for other people than myself.
	You can always protect a child from a cold if you follow him and dress him correctly.
	In difficult circumstances, I prefer to wait until problems resolve themselves.
	Success is the result of hard work and little depends on chance or luck.
	I feel that more than anyone else, the happiness of my family depends on me.
	I have always found it difficult to understand why some people like me and others don't.
	I always prefer to make a decision and act on your own, rather than relying on the help of other people or to fate
	Unfortunately, the merits of a person often remain unrecognized, despite all his efforts.
	In family life, there are situations that cannot be resolved even with the strongest desire.
	Capable people who failed to realize their potential have only themselves to blame.
	Many of my successes were only possible thanks to the help of other people.
	Most of the failures in my life came from ignorance or laziness and depended little on luck or bad luck.

Results processing

Processing of test results is carried out in several stages. The number corresponding to the choice determines the number of points received for each answer. First, using the keys, the scores for each scale are calculated (simple summation). At the same time, points for answers to questions with a “+” sign are summed up with their own sign, and for questions with a “–” sign - with the opposite sign.

Keys to scales

1. Scale of general internality (Io)

2. Scale of internality in the field of achievements (ID)

3. Scale of internality in the field of failures (In)

5. Scale of internality in the field of industrial relations (IR)

7. Scale of internality in relation to health and disease (From)

As a result of scoring for each of the scales, so-called "raw" scores are obtained, which must be converted into standard scores (walls). To do this, use a special table.

Table for converting "raw" scores to standard scores

Click image for a larger view

The scores obtained in the walls are entered in the table:

Final table of results

The results expressed in the walls are compared with the norm (5.5 walls). An indicator above 5.5 walls indicates an internal type of control in this area, below 5.5 - an external one.

The results can also be presented as a graph or as a profile.

Example of a USC chart

USK profile example

Interpretation of the results

Psychologically, a person with high rate of subjective control possesses emotional stability, perseverance, determination, sociability, high self-control and restraint. Man with low subjective control emotionally unstable, prone to informal behavior, uncommunicative, poor self-control and high tension.

Scale of general internality (Io). High rate on this scale corresponds to a high level of subjective control over any significant situations. Such people believe that most of the important events in their lives are the result of their own actions, that they can control them. They feel their own responsibility for these events and for the way their life as a whole develops. Subjects with low level subjective control do not see the connection between their actions and significant life events for them. They do not consider themselves capable of controlling their development and believe that most events are the result of chance or the actions of other people.

Scale of internality in the field of achievements (Id). High rate on this scale corresponds to a high level of subjective control over emotionally positive events and situations. Such people believe that they themselves have achieved everything that was and is in their life, and that they are able to successfully achieve their goals in the future. Low rate on a scale indicates that a person attributes his successes and achievements to circumstances - luck, good fortune or the help of other people.

Scale of internality in the field of failures (In). High rate on this scale reflects a developed sense of subjective control in relation to negative events and situations, which is manifested in a tendency to blame oneself for various troubles and suffering. Low rate indicates that the subject is inclined to attribute responsibility for such events to other people or to consider them the result of bad luck.

Scale of internality in the field family relations(Is). High rate Is means that a person considers himself responsible for the events taking place in his family life. Low rate Is indicates that the subject considers his partners responsible for the situations that arise in his family.

Scale of internality in the field of industrial relations (IP). High rate on this scale indicates that in the organization of their production activities a person relies mainly on himself. He believes that he can influence his relationships with colleagues, manage them and be responsible for them; thinks that his professional career, promotion depends more on himself than on other people or external forces. Low rate indicates that a person has a tendency not to take responsibility for their professional successes and failures. Such a person believes that not he himself, but someone else - bosses, colleagues, luck, etc. - determine everything that happens to him in this area.

Scale of internality in the field of interpersonal relations (Im). High rate It testifies to them that a person considers himself able to control his formal and informal relationships with other people, to arouse respect and sympathy for himself. Low rate , on the contrary, indicates that a person cannot actively form his social circle and tends to consider his interpersonal relationships as the result of the activity of partners.

Scale of internality in relation to health and disease (Iz). High rate indicate that the subject considers himself responsible for his health: if he is sick, he blames himself for this and believes that recovery largely depends on his actions. Man with low rate on this scale, he considers the disease the result of an accident and hopes that recovery will come as a result of the actions of others, primarily doctors.

For professional diagnostics, the most informative are the results on the scale of internality in industrial relations (Ip). Results on other scales make it possible to build a multidimensional profile. Since most people are characterized by a more or less wide variability of behavior depending on specific social situations, the characteristics of subjective control can also change in a person depending on whether the situation seems to him complex or simple, pleasant or unpleasant, etc.

The level of subjective control increases as a result of psychological correction. At the same time, it should be remembered that internals prefer non-directive methods of psychological correction; and externals, as individuals with increased anxiety and prone to depression, are subjectively more satisfied with behavioral methods.

Psychology: personality and business

Keywords:

1 -1

Psychological safety: tutorial Solomin Valery Pavlovich

Method for determining the dominant state

Used for testing adults.

Target: determination of the characteristics of moods and some other characteristics of the personal level of mental states using subjective assessments of the subject. The main purpose of the questionnaire is the diagnosis of relatively stable (dominant) conditions.

Instruction. The questionnaire contains signs that describe the state, behavior, attitude of a person to various phenomena. Assess how these signs are characteristic of you, keeping in mind not only today, but a longer period of time.

Do not seek to "improve" or "worse" the answers, this will lead to unreliable results, as the technique catches the distortion and insincerity of the answers. You can be sure that your answers will not be disclosed.

Your agreement with each judgment given in the questionnaire must be expressed using a seven-point scale:

1 - completely disagree;

2 - agree to a small extent;

3 - almost half agree;

4 - half agree;

5 - more than half agree;

6 - agree almost completely;

7 - I agree completely.

By choosing one of the scale points: 1.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7, you will express the degree of your agreement with this judgment. Record your chosen score on the answer sheet next to the item number, indicating your last name (or pseudonym) and the date and time you started work at the top of the sheet.

Do not skip a single item of the questionnaire. Please do not write or underline anything in the text of the questionnaire. Please do not transfer one number to another in the same place. To correct, cross out the unnecessary number and write a new one on the right.

Questionnaire

1. My body reacts strongly to weather changes or climate changes.

2. Very often there is a mood when I am easily distracted from business, become absent-minded and dreamy.

3. I worry very often.

4. I often have trouble falling asleep.

5. A lot of small troubles drive me crazy.

6. My thoughts constantly return to possible failures, and it is difficult for me to direct them in another direction.

7. I often praise people I know very little.

8. I experience vague anxiety, fear, I don’t know why.

9. If everyone is against me, I do not lose heart at all.

10. I wake up unrested and tired in the morning.

11. I often feel worthless.

12. I can't control my annoyance or anger.

13. Difficult tasks cheer me up.

14. My head often hurts.

15. It often happens that I gossip with someone.

16. I often have a premonition that some kind of punishment awaits me.

17. I am easily offended by a word.

18. I am full of energy.

19. There is a conflict between my plans and reality.

20. In situations of prolonged neuropsychic stress, I show endurance.

21. My table manners at home are usually not as good as at a party.

22. Very often some trifle takes possession of my thoughts and disturbs me for several days.

23. Very often I feel tired, lethargic.

24. I miss an opportunity by not making a decision fast enough.

25. There are so many things that annoy me easily.

26. I often feel tense and anxious when I think about what happened during the day.

27. When I feel unwell, I am irritable.

28. Very often I have a spleen (dreary mood).

29. In the morning, after waking up, I still feel tired and overwhelmed for a long time.

30. I like to constantly overcome new difficulties.

31. I have a desire to change a lot in my lifestyle, but I lack the strength.

32. In most cases, I easily overcome disappointment.

33. Satisfying some of my needs and desires makes it impossible to satisfy others.

34. Often an indecent or even obscene joke makes me laugh.

35. I look to the future with complete confidence.

36. I lose my patience very often.

37. People disappoint me.

38. Bad thoughts often come to my mind, which are better not to talk about.

39. I get bored of everything quickly.

40. It seems to me that I am close to a nervous breakdown.

41. I often experience general weakness.

42. I am often told that I am quick-tempered.

Interpretation of results. In this method, when interpreting the obtained numerical values, the conversion of raw scores into standard ones, into T-scores, is used. The scales of standard T-scores are constructed in this way: the average values are equated to 50 T-scores; 10 T-scores are equal to one sigma (sigma is the standard deviation.)

Increased scores on a particular scale are scores in 55 or more T-scores. This is a deviation from the average value upwards of more than half a sigma.

Downgraded scores are scores of 45 or less T-points. This is a downward deviation from the mean by more than half a sigma.

High scores are scores of 60 or more T-points.

Low scores are scores of 40 or less T-points.

Scales

Scale "Ak": "active - passive attitude to the life situation." This scale allows you to get an idea about the characteristics of the state, in most cases, it depends more strongly on the corresponding property of the personality - activity, than on other factors. It should be taken into account that activity is only relatively stable, since the predisposition to an active or passive attitude, response depends on many current circumstances, social environment, as well as events preceding the life period of the individual. To diagnose states and moods, it is especially important to take into account the strength of faith in achieving one's goals, to identify an active or passive position in relation to the current life situation. This parameter is especially important in diagnosing stress conditions.

High marks - more than 60 T-points. An active, optimistic attitude to the life situation is expressed, there is a readiness to overcome obstacles, faith in one's capabilities. Feeling the strength to overcome obstacles and achieve your goals. Cheerfulness is higher than most people.

Low grades - less than 40 T-points. Passive attitude to the life situation, in the assessment of many life situations, a pessimistic position prevails, disbelief in the possibility of successfully overcoming obstacles.

Scale "To": "tone: high - low." In a situation of acute stress, a person often experiences a feeling of strength, but the opposite picture is often observed - a feeling of weakness. A similar picture can be observed with prolonged stress. Energy characteristics for any mental state are the most important measurement. They are especially necessary for predicting the developed state of the individual. In the diagnosis of stressful conditions, they provide valuable data on the depth of stress.

High marks. Characterized by high activity, sthenic reaction to emerging difficulties. Subjective sensations of inner composure, reserve of strength, energy. Willingness to work, including long-term.

Low ratings. Characterized by fatigue, lack of assembly, lethargy, inertia, low performance. There are fewer opportunities to be active, to expend energy, the resource of forces is reduced, and fatigue is increased. Tendency to show asthenic reactions to emerging difficulties.

Scale "Sp": "calmness - anxiety." In a mental state, the experience of anxiety is of decisive importance for a number of other phenomena. It is anxiety that enhances the sound of emotiogenic stimuli of various strengths, including minor ones, increasing the intensity of negative emotions, exacerbating their negative impact on consciousness, behavior and activity. The scale is designed to measure the level of generalized anxiety. In the literature, it is also referred to by the terms "free floating", "unmotivated", etc. Among the types of anxiety for this type of people, long-term, long-lasting emotional experiences are most characteristic.

High marks. Greater confidence in their abilities and capabilities than most people.

Low ratings. There is a tendency to experience anxiety in a wide range of life situations, to see a threat to prestige, well-being, no matter how real the reasons are. Anticipation of events with an unfavorable outcome, a premonition of a future threat (punishment, loss of respect or self-esteem) without a clear understanding of its sources.

Scale "Us": "stability - instability of the emotional tone."

High marks. An even positive emotional tone prevails, a calm flow of emotional processes. High emotional stability, in a state of emotional arousal, the adequacy and effectiveness of mental self-regulation, behavior and activity is preserved. Very low scores can be interpreted as emotional rigidity.

Low ratings. Emotional stability is reduced, emotional arousal easily arises, mood is changeable, irritability is increased, negative emotional tone prevails.

Scale "Ud": "satisfaction - dissatisfaction with life in general (its course, the process of self-realization)". Difficulties in the process of self-realization lead to experiences of voluminous emotional discomfort. This characteristic has a special diagnostic significance in individual counseling and psycho-correctional work. The experience of the fullness of life is one of the main pillars of the psychological stability of the individual. Feelings of emptiness are a risk factor for neurotic and depressive disorders, alcohol dependence. The judgments included in this scale relate to the internal aspects of experiences, to the feeling of satisfaction with one's life. Since the criteria for the success of self-realization are subjective, the subjective assessment of the success of self-realization is also most important for the diagnostician. Full self-realization of a person is not only the development of any special abilities, but also the development of his potentialities as a strong and integral human being, free from internal coercions that crippled him.

High marks. Satisfaction with life in general, its course, self-realization, the way life goes. A person feels the ability to take responsibility and the ability to make his own choice, in which the voice of his own "I" is heard. The subject feels ready to overcome difficulties in realizing his abilities (if his higher needs are activated). A fairly high assessment of personal success.

Low ratings. Dissatisfaction with life in general, its course, the process of self-realization and how exactly the main life events are currently unfolding. Low assessment of personal success. At present, a person has not found himself completely, has not revealed himself, has not felt reliable internal supports in himself, does not feel the ability to demand truthful answers from himself. Often characterized by withdrawal into doubt, which allows you to evade the need to make life choices, listening primarily to yourself, taking responsibility for what happens to you.

Scale "Po": "positive - negative image of oneself." This scale is auxiliary, it allows you to determine the criticality of self-assessment (low or high), the adequacy of self-assessment. On a scale of b points. The criticality of self-evaluation is closely related to the acceptance of the personality itself. The more positive the image of oneself, the less a person sees shortcomings in himself. Self-acceptance has a significant impact on mood - the more complete self-acceptance and the more positive feelings emotionally towards oneself, the higher the mood. Indicators on the “By” scale have a significant positive correlation with indicators on the main scales. Positive acceptance of oneself improves the mental state, and vice versa - a more favorable state encourages one to see one's shortcomings as insignificant, allows one to evaluate one's behavior as closer to the norm.

Highly high marks speak of a lack of self-understanding. The sum of more than 65 points gives grounds to assume low criticality in self-assessment, insufficient adequacy of self-assessment, insincerity. Other reasons may be: a negative attitude towards the survey, the influence of the subject's strong interest in the "positive, good" results of the survey.

Estimates of 60-64 points mean reduced criticality in self-assessment, insufficient adequacy of self-assessment. If high scores of more than 60 are obtained on the Vs, Sp, or Ud scales, then most likely the data as a whole is not sufficiently reliable.

Indicators in the range of 40–59 characterize the degree of self-acceptance by a person. The higher the standard score, the lower the criticality of self-assessment and the greater the acceptance of oneself with all its shortcomings.

With scores of less than 50 points, there is reason to talk about sufficient sincerity in the answers, an expressed desire for adequacy in assessing their psychological characteristics and his condition, about the criticality in self-assessment.

Low scores - less than 40 points - indicate not only a high criticality in evaluating oneself and a great desire to be sincere, but also a negative attitude towards oneself.

Key

Ak: 9, 13, 18, 20, 30, 32, 35.

That: 1, 4, 10, 14, 23, 29, 41.

Sp: 3, 6, 8, 16, 22, 26.

Us: 5, 12, 25, 36, 39, 40, 42.

Oud: 2, 11, 17, 19, 24, 28, 31, 33, 37.

By: 7, 15, 21, 27, 34, 38.

RAW POINTS TO T-POINTS CONVERSION TABLE (for women)

Table continuation

RAW POINTS TO T-POINTS CONVERSION TABLE (for men)

Table continuation

This text is an introductory piece. author Solomin Valery Pavlovich

Method for determining short-term memory It is used to examine people of any age. Purpose: determination of the volume of short-term visual memory. Description. The subjects must memorize and then reproduce the maximum number of numbers from