» What is a pacifist definition. Who is a pacifist? Is the character positive or negative? Pacifism Information About

What is a pacifist definition. Who is a pacifist? Is the character positive or negative? Pacifism Information About

We have all heard the word "pacifist". However, sometimes we misunderstand (or inaccurately) its meaning. Many are sure that the concept is used to refer to one of the youth trends - something like hippies fashionable in the seventies of the last century. There is some truth in this opinion. But it's the share.

In fact, a pacifist is not just a freedom-loving peaceful person who advocates the abolition of strict control over the individual. A true pacifist is an opponent of any kind of military action. In general, this is a person who is "for world peace," to put it broadly. Let's get to know this interesting person in more detail.

The threat of a nuclear apocalypse intensifies pacifist sentiment,
with the spread of pacifism, war recedes and trade flourishes,
trade increases the profitability of peace and the unprofitability of war.
Yuval Noah Harari. Sapiens. Short story humanity
Explanation of the quote: The author popularly explains how the reduction in the number of wars is connected with the advent of nuclear weapons.

Where "legs grow"

A pacifist is a representative of an ideology that does not accept war, murder, or the infliction of any bodily harm on members of an opposing group.

It does not matter what caused the military conflict and what goals the warring parties pursue - it should be extinguished, regardless of whether it is a battle at the global level or a local "war" between teenagers, as they said in the 90s, "in the area."

The literal meaning of the word, if translated from Latin, is "to make peace." In the language of the ancient Latins and Romans, the term is written "pacificus".

Surely, humanity knew pacifists back in those days when some primitive personalities in robes made of bear skins oppressed others, trying to drive them away from more profitable and livable territories and win back the best representatives of the fair sex for themselves.

Most likely, even then the world was divided into those who wanted and knew how to attack, those who fearlessly fought back, and those who meekly accepted their unenviable fate, not wanting to shed anyone's blood.

In that period of history, when Christianity was born, one can already safely refer to historical sources that recorded the actions of real pacifists. These were the first Christians who were deeply disgusted by the debauchery and unbridledness of the Roman army. They simply refused to fight.

Of course, such "apostates" were awaiting retribution - execution. It should be noted that not always the reason for refusing to participate in the battles was the rejection of the murder as such. Perhaps if these knights of pacifism had fought for other ideals, they would have remained in the ranks of the attackers. But history cannot be reversed.

So, we now know that the concept of "pacifism" came to us from the distant past. A pacifist is a person who denies the need for war and murder, who is alien to any aggression, violence used in any situation.

Signs of a pacifist

Is it possible to literally determine at a glance that you are facing a person who opposes the statement “Good should be with fists”? Can!

Here are the signs of a true pacifist:

  • a person does not express aggression towards anyone;
    mildly condemns government intervention in any local conflicts at the international level;
    refuses to serve in the army.
Also pay attention to the natural temperament of your interlocutor: a pacifist is more likely to become a melancholic and phlegmatic, and much less likely to be a choleric.

Pros and cons of pacifism

What are the pros and cons of pacifism? On the one hand, it might seem that negative aspects in this phenomenon is not at all. Not giving an aggressive rebuff to the offender is great! Turning the left cheek when they hit on the right is so Christian, so selfless. Such an act should awaken the conscience of the most vicious and insidious enemy and turn him into a lamb.

Actually, it's not that simple!

A healthy share of aggression should be in every person. It can also be called differently:

  • excitement;
    ambition;
    thirst for justice;
    desire to protect yourself and your loved ones.
This is normal and natural. Imagine what would happen, for example, to the fabulous Ivan Tsarevich if, having declared himself a pacifist, he refused to fight with the Serpent Gorynych? The beautiful Vasilisa would still be a prisoner of the villain, the tsar-father would sob inconsolably, and Ivan himself would turn into an object of popular ridicule. And no happy ending.

It's easy to be a pacifist when there's no war, but can you keep your hands clean when they want to kill someone you care about?
Alexandrina Bobrakova. Adam


Pacifism has its drawbacks. People who never violate its principles suffer themselves:
  • do not achieve heights in a career;
    are reputed to be weaklings and do not receive respect in their environment.
If during the Second World War the army Soviet Union consisted of some pacifists - it's scary to imagine what kind of end mankind would have expected. Probably, you and I would not now discuss the psychological aspects of the concept of "pacifism": there would be no pacifists. However, as well as their antagonists - the militarists (such is the antonym for the word "pacifist"). In fact, no one would be alive.

On the other hand, the idea of ​​pacifism is inherently beautiful. Just think about it: there are no wars on Earth. Nowhere, not in Iraq, not in Afghanistan, not in Syria! Teenagers do not arrange showdowns, children do not fight. Utopia, in a word!

Indeed, if all of humanity consisted only of peaceful individuals, giving each other a seat on the bus, life on our planet would become truly beautiful! So a small seed of the idea of ​​pacifism must someday give wonderful shoots.

We will probably come to this. It is no coincidence that humanism is “in trend” today, and for more than a decade. In the meantime, alas, "Good must be with fists."

I can stand up for myself and for my beloved! To give it to the eye, like a pacifist in the soul, will, of course, be unpleasant, but if there are no other arguments, the man resorts to action.
Sergey Vitalievich Bezrukov

Famous pacifists of the world

Now let's, figuratively speaking, "shake the dust of centuries off our boots" and look at our time.
What does “pacifist” mean (that is, the term itself), you will understand without further explanation if you strain your memory a little.

Remember names like:

  • John Lennon;
    Lev Tolstoy;
    Albert Einstein.
    George Bernard Shaw;
    Mahatma Gandhi;
    Aldous Huxley;
    Dalai Lama XIV;
    and many more famous people.
What united such different personalities, except for a huge talent?

All of them in one way or another supported the theory of pacifism:

  • John Lennon did not recognize the war.

    Leo Tolstoy developed his own system of views, which his followers characterize as "non-resistance to evil by violence." The writer believed: if we resist a person who insults us and behaves aggressively, the amount of evil in the world will only increase due to outbreaks of retaliatory aggression.

    Einstein's position was original. At one time he had to take part in the development atomic bomb. He even urged President Roosevelt, saying in a letter sent to him: “If you do not move forward soon with regard to the development of nuclear weapons, Nazi Germany will. Hurry up!

    So, Einstein was an ardent supporter of world peace - he just saw no other way to achieve peace, except to keep potential invaders "at gunpoint." True, he himself later blamed himself for the fact that mankind had at its disposal a terrible atomic weapon.

I'm not just a pacifist, I'm a militant pacifist.
I am ready to fight for the world.
Nothing will end in war if the people themselves refuse to go to war.
Albert Einstein


Perhaps it would be appropriate here to say a few words about one more person who put his whole life on the altar of serving his loved ones. It's about Mother Teresa. This woman carried the palm branch of peace wherever she went. She helped all the suffering, regardless of who they were and on whose side they were.

For a true pacifist, there is only one value that is above all others - human life.

Conclusion

As you can see, the concept of "pacifism" and its supporters, pacifists, can be treated differently. It is impossible to say unequivocally whether it is good or bad to be a pacifist. It all depends on the situation you are in.

How would you explain this concept to your children? For example, like this: " a pacifist is a person who will never fight with others", or in other words? Do you want to see them as people who are resolutely opposed to any military actions and conflicts? How benevolent modern world to a real pacifist?

The term and the very concept of "pacifism" has Latin origin. The meaning of the word is interpreted as "peacemaker". These are the people who bring peace. The peak of the development of the pacifism movement falls on the period after 1945. Huge losses of human lives caused the development of movements for peace and non-violence.

Today's representatives of pacifists are multimillion-strong masses who have rallied under a single slogan, having their own ideology, offices and international representations.

The relevance of pacifism

The relevance of pacifism can be judged by the statistics of people who died during numerous wars. 17th century - due to wars, mankind has lost more than three million people. During the years of the 18th and 19th centuries, the figure increased to ten and a half million.

During the first and second world wars, more than 80 million population. Over the five thousand years of the existence of human civilization, the flames of war have claimed more than four billion human lives.

In addition to huge human losses, military problems are associated with the build-up of military power for self-defense. It's backbreaking economic costs which fall on the shoulders of the population and cause significant damage to the state budget. Education of militaristic consciousness in society. Ideological indoctrination of the population in the spirit of intolerance towards the population of another country.

The essence of ideology and the historical period of its development

The ideology of pacifists does not accept violent methods of settling problems. They do not take military action in any of the existing aspects, including "liberation" and "sacred" war. It is based on the principle of peaceful settlement of all disputes through negotiations, rallies and demonstrations.

The emergence of ideology and the formation of its basic ideas can be traced back to the time of Buddhism. Its founder, Siddhartha Gautama, preached development of spirituality and enlightenment based intellectual development and enrichment.

The next stage of peacemaking ideology is connected with Christianity. Initially, any Christian was a pacifist. During the reign of Constantine the Great 306-337 according to the Julian calendar, pacifism practically disappears from the practice of the Christian church.

The reformation period is characterized bloody religious wars, which laid the foundation for the protesting side of the Anabaptists. Of the outstanding personalities of this period, one can name Baron Montesquieu, George Fox, Erasmus of Rotterdam.

Their movement considered unacceptable the participation of Christians not only in the war zone, but also in politics. In the early 18th century, pacifism became an integral part of the Lutheran movement - pietism.

Formation of the ideology of peaceful transformations in Russia, the merit of the famous pacifist Leo Tolstoy. Among the prominent supporters of non-violent methods of transforming society based on spiritual self-improvement are Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King.

The movement of pacifism at the present stage

The emergence of pacifist organizations dates back to the late 1880s. The holding of congresses of international level takes place with offers of a complete demilitarization of society. Leaders come out with proposals to replace military dispute resolution with independent arbitration courts.

The end of World War II completes the history of pre-nuclear pacifism. The nuclear age presents the manifesto of the largest representatives of pacifism of the thirties, B. Russell - A. Einstein, which bears the signatures of eleven world-famous scientists of that time.

This anti-war proclamation formed the basis pugwash movement scientists for preventing the possibility nuclear war, disarmament and security

Ideas peacekeeping and non-violence can be traced in youth movements, starting from the 60s. With a protest against bureaucracy and totalitarianism, representatives of the youth movement - the hippies - come out.

Among the well-known personalities supporting the ideology of pacifism are the popular Beatles, an American singer and public figure Stevie Wonder, popular singer and dancer, King of Pop Michael Jackson, Hollywood actor and producer Jim Carrey and many others.

During the years of the Soviet Union, pacifism was viewed as an anti-Soviet manifestation. Persons who expressed a clear protest against military service were subjected to persecution. Among them is A.D. Sakharov, and hippie representatives.

Pros and cons of pacifism

Any philosophical system contains element of imperfection. Murder is undoubtedly a tragedy and should not be encouraged by society and the law. But, in a situation related to an attack on the homeland or family, there is no unequivocal solution.

pacifism, pacifism is
Pacifism(from Latin pacificus - peacemaking, from pax - peace and facio - I do) - the ideology of resistance to violence for the sake of its disappearance. Pacifist movement, peace movement- anti-war social movement opposing war and violence by peaceful means, mainly by condemning their immorality. Anti-war demonstration against the 2003 invasion of Iraq in Sheffield, UK.

Often linked with the anti-militarist and anti-imperialist movement.

Pacifists condemn all war, denying the very possibility of wars being legitimate, liberating, sacred, etc. They believe in the possibility of preventing wars only through persuasion and peaceful demonstrations.

  • 1. History
    • 1.1 Antiquity
    • 1.2 Christian pacifism
    • 1.3 Pacifism in the USSR
    • 1.4 Modernity
  • 2 Criticism
  • 3 Notable pacifists
  • 4 See also
  • 5 Notes
  • 6 Literature
    • 6.1 Main texts
    • 6.2 Research
    • 6.3 Criticism
  • 7 Links

Story

Antiquity

Stoics were pacifists, who opposed the coercion of the freedom of others, believing that goodness does not go unrequited: after all, I would not thank the well-wisher. Marcus Aurelius wrote: "The most The best way vengeance is not to return evil for evil. The dignity of a man is to love even those who offend him.

Christian pacifism

Main article: Christian pacifism

Pacifists were found among the early Christians. Although the New Testament does not directly condemn military service, as can be seen from the example of the pious centurion, the soldiers who came to be baptized by John the Baptist, the centurion Cornelius and others, some Christians could avoid military service due to the moral licentiousness that reigned in the Roman army, and also because for unwillingness to participate in pagan rituals that accompanied military life. At the same time, some early Christian writers adhered to a pacifist position. So Justin Martyr wrote: “And we, who before killed one another, not only do not quarrel with enemies, but, so as not to lie and deceive those who interrogate, we joyfully confess Christ and die.” The most striking expression of pacifism is Tertullian's treatise "On the Warrior's Crown", written by him after his transition to the Montanist sect. At the same time, pacifism was not the predominant trend in the life of the early Christian church. It is noteworthy that there is no known source from any Christian church about excommunication or penance imposed on a particular member of the church for being a warrior. As time went on, more and more Christians chose military service. Under Marcus Aurelius, they were already part of one of the great legions of the Roman army, the XII Lightning Legion, under Diocletian they were in the personal guard of the emperor. After the acquisition of state power by Christians under Constantine the Great, pacifism almost disappeared from the sphere of church thought and practice.

However, pacifism did not die with the acceptance by most Christians of the idea that "just" violence was justified. At the turn of the first and second millennia of our era in the monastery of Cluny in France, a movement for the establishment of the "God's world" began. From the peasants to the king, everyone took an oath not to unleash hostilities first, to avoid any kind of violence against the unarmed.

Consistently pacifism was defended by critics of the official church - the Cathars, the Waldensians, the Tertiary Franciscans, as well as the Hussites - a supporter of Peter Chelchitsky. The well-known Christian humanist Erasmus of Rotterdam also spoke out against wars.

The Reformation led to bloody religious wars. They were opposed by the peaceful wing of the Anabaptists, who rejected the participation of a Christian not only in war, but also in politics. Also consistent pacifists were the Quakers, who arose in the middle of the 17th century. Thanks to Alexander Mak, who organized the Brethren Church in 1708, pacifism became an integral part of pietism.

The first pacifist organizations in the West arose in Great Britain and the United States after the Napoleonic Wars. By the end of the 1880s and the beginning of the 1890s, the movement was widespread. International congresses of pacifists have repeatedly come up with proposals to ban wars, to carry out general disarmament, and to resolve disputes that arise between states in international arbitration courts. The spread of pacifism in Russia is largely connected with the activities of Leo Tolstoy (see also the article Tolstoy).

Pacifism in the USSR

Main article: Group for the establishment of trust between the USSR and the USA

The official course of the USSR towards peace and disarmament was based on the readiness of the citizens of the USSR to fulfill their duty to defend the Motherland, in connection with which those pacifists and their movements that expressed a negative attitude towards the army and military service in general, they were persecuted as anti-Soviet elements. First of all, these were representatives of the dissident movement (for example, Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov), as well as representatives of youth subcultures, in particular hippies. And although the Criminal Code of the RSFSR did not contain an article for propaganda or a call to pacifism, pacifists were imprisoned under other "suitable" articles: "parasitism", "evasion of conscription for military service", "malicious hooliganism", "anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda", "slander against the state and social order". At the same time, it should be noted that the pacifism of Soviet dissidents was also contradictory and inconsistent: for example, those A.D. Sakharov in 1953 proposed an anti-human plan to destroy American cities with the help of artificial tsunamis, many dissidents actually hindered the disarmament process with their activities, campaigning not to trust the USSR.

Modernity

The activities of the pacifists led to the fact that in the legislation of many countries where there is conscription, it was possible to replace it with an alternative civilian service.

Pacifists use various forms of protest against war and violence, including such unusual ones as "Die-in" (imitation of death).

Deserter, 1916. World War I cartoon. Jesus Christ is shot by soldiers of all warring countries.

Criticism

George Orwell wrote of contemporary English pacifists: “Most pacifists either belong to insignificant religious sects, or they are simply humanists who object to taking people’s lives, and go no further than this thought. But among pacifist intellectuals there is a minority whose pacifism is based on hatred of Western democracy and worship of totalitarianism... Pacifist literature is replete with vague statements in which, if there is any meaning, it is only that statesmen like Hitler, preferable to the likes of Churchill, and violence is perhaps excusable if it is cruel enough."

Robert Aumann, laureate Nobel Prize in Economics 2005, explains: “When the aggressor sees that his methods are working, he continues to follow them and puts forward more and more new demands. If the aggressor encounters determined resistance, he reconsiders his approach. Pacifism leads to war, because the country where it becomes an ideology begins to play by the rules of the aggressor.”

The Protestant theologian and philosopher Reinhold Niebuhr wrote that "primitive Christian moralization is meaningless and confusing", that we cannot assume that we can act in history only when we are innocent, that the evils of tyranny can sometimes be eliminated only by war, and sentimental illusions lead to capitulation to tyranny, that the pacifists' conception of human nature is entirely based on the illusion that Christians must defend the strongholds of civilization, and pacifism does not understand the tragedy of history.

Notable pacifists

  • Marshall Bruce Mathers III
  • Bertha von Suttner
  • Lev Tolstoy
  • Bob Marley
  • Belinda Carlyle
  • John Lennon
  • Jim Morrison
  • Alfred Nobel
  • Mahatma Gandhi
  • Jim carrey
  • Brigitte Bardot
  • Albert Einstein
  • Samantha Smith
  • Viktor Tsoi
  • Ali, Mohammed
  • Roger Waters
  • Larry Flynt
  • Erich Maria Remarque
  • William Saroyan
  • Ulf Ekberg
  • Moana Pozzi
  • Michael Jackson
  • Muss Ilya
  • Peaceful Wanderer
  • Joan Baez
  • Cicciolina
  • Bertrand Russell
  • Susan Sarandon
  • Lady Gaga
  • Janet Rankin is the only member of the US Congress to vote against US entry into both World War I and World War II.
  • Stevie Wonder

see also

  • Christian pacifism
  • Nonviolence
  • Antimilitarism
  • Anarcho-pacifism
  • Refuser of conscience

Notes

  1. 1 2 Christian Pacifism before Constantine by David B. Kopel
  2. D. Orwell. Notes on Nationalism
  3. About peacekeeping. "Moment of Truth" Professor Aumann
  4. Jeannette Rankin. Women in Congress.
  5. Stevie Wonder pulls out of IDF concert | RIA News. Retrieved February 19, 2013. Archived from the original on February 26, 2013.

Literature

Basic texts

  • A. Schweitzer about Mo-Tzu and Lao-Tzu - from the article "Christianity and World Religions"
  • N. N. Gusev "Attitude of the first Christians to the war"
  • P. Brock "Attitude towards non-violence in pacifist sects in the Middle Ages and early modern times" // "Non-violence as a worldview and way of life", M., IVI RAN, 2000.
  • Erasmus of Rotterdam "The Complaint of the World" (1517)
  • B. f. Suttner "Down with weapons!" (1889)
  • L. N. Tolstoy "The Kingdom of God is within you..." (1890-93)
  • L. N. Tolstoy "The Law of Violence and the Law of Love" (1908)
  • M. A. Popovsky “Russian peasants tell. Followers of Leo Tolstoy in the Soviet Union 1918-1977. L., 1983
  • P. V. Verigin "Declaration of fraternal life" (1898)
  • P. I. Biryukov "The Persecution of Christians in Russia in 1895" - about Dukhobors
  • N. N. Molchanov "War to War" - a fragment from the book "Jean Zhores" (ZHZL), M., 1986
  • "Nobel Peace Prize 1947" - about Quakers
  • "Why don't Jehovah's Witnesses participate in wars?" // The Watchtower, July 1, 2008.
  • D. Heinz "Seventh-day Adventists and refusal to participate in hostilities: a historical perspective" // "Non-violence as a worldview and way of life", M., IVI RAN, 2000.
  • U. Savatsky "Pacifist Protestants in Soviet Russia in the Interwar Period" // "The Long Way of Russian Pacifism", M., IVI RAN, 1997.
  • Archimandrite Spiridon (Kislyakov) "Confession of a priest before the church" (1916)
  • M. and L. Zwick "Dorothy Day, Prophet of Pacifism in the Catholic Church"
  • "Biography" of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan - non-violence and Islam.
  • B. Russell "Autobiography" // "Foreign Literature", 2000, No. 12
  • T. I. Telyukova "Moscow group" Trust "" - see. Group for the establishment of trust between the USSR and the USA

Research

  • F. Dyson "Arms and Hope", M., "Progress", 1990 - chapters from the book.
  • "Pacifism in History". M.: IVI RAN, 1997
  • "The Long Way of Russian Pacifism". M.: IVI RAN, 1997.
  • D. Sdvizhkov “Against ‘iron and blood’. Pacifism in the German Empire”, M., IVI RAN, 1999
  • G. Page "A society without murder: is it possible?", St. Petersburg: SPBU Publishing House, 2005 - see Rejection of murder
  • "Treatises on Eternal Peace". M., Sotsekgiz, 1963
  • N. Karapetyan "NEW" PACIFISM ATTRACT
  • I. Gordeeva Radical pacifist movement in Russia - XX century
  • A. D. Epshtein From Pacifism to Political Protest: The Israeli Anti-War Movement from the Founding of the State to the First Lebanon War
  • Songs against war

Criticism

  • Ignat DANILENKO, Olga GUSEVA. Shall we put out the torch of Herostratus? Tolstoy and Dragomirov: the dispute continues
  • A. Almog "Shalom akhshav" against the world

Links

Wiktionary has an article "pacifism"
  • Project Library "Beyond Violence"
  • Project Library
  • Section "Peacemaking" in the library of Ya. G. Krotov

sign of pacifism, pacifism, pacifism wikipedia, pacifism what is it, pacifism is it, philosophy of pacifism, what is pacifism

Pacifism Information About

The more wars there are in the world, the more often you hear the word "pacifist". But not everyone knows who are pacifists.

In the broad sense of the word, a pacifist is a person who opposes war in any of its manifestations, and is always only on the side of peace.

If we turn to dictionaries and exact definitions of terms, it will look like this.

A pacifist is a person who adheres to the ideas of pacifism.

Pacifism (from Latin pacificus - peacekeeping, from pax - peace and facio - I do) is an ideology whose main priority is resistance to violence, for the sake of its complete disappearance.

It is easy to guess that pacifists vehemently condemn any war, considering even the wording itself unacceptable: “holy war”, “liberation war”, etc.

Among the many well-known figures of the past and present, there were both staunch supporters of pacifism and its no less staunch opponents.

Pacific

It goes without saying that a movement like pacifism has its own symbol. It is called "Pacific" (eng. pacific "peaceful") and was specially designed by designer Gerald Holtom in 1958. An interesting fact is that it is completely identical to the version of the emblem of the 3rd Panzer Division of the Wehrmacht, which during the Second World War was a symbol of death.

It is curious what the organizers were thinking about when they proclaimed the symbol "Pacific" in this form?

Like any other idea, pacifism has many positives and negatives. In our imperfect world, there are no perfect philosophical systems or ideas, so pacifists are no exception.

On the one hand, any murder is always an irreparable tragedy, and on the other hand, what should a person do if his family or homeland is attacked by an enemy who wants him dead? Therefore, everything looks far from unambiguous.

An inquisitive reader will be interested: the antonym for the word pacifism is militarism, which means “military” in Latin.

Since ancient times, pacifists have been arguing with their opponents - the militarists, and history does not stop at one specific idea. As you know, any war ends in peace. But can there be a world without war? Humanity has not yet answered this question.

That is why the ideas of pacifism are largely considered utopian, which simply cannot be implemented in our world.

Notable pacifists

Below are some prominent pacifists whose names are known throughout the world.

(Interesting Facts about Tolstoy)

The question of who a pacifist is can be briefly answered - an adherent of pacifism, a movement that is a reality rather negative than positive. "Non-resistance to evil by violence" could never, due to its spinelessness, become the ideology of any state. But if the opposite happened, according to Nobel Prize winner Robert Aumann, such a country would play by the rules of the aggressor. That is, there is good and evil, and it is impossible not to take a specific side.

Neither yours nor ours

The term "pacifist" itself comes from Latin words pax (peace) and facio (to do). But a pacifist does not make peace, he does nothing, at best he lies with a poster on the pavement or rants in parliament. And very often, under the guise of fighting any violence, it contributes to the suppression of the liberation movement. Who is a pacifist? This is the one everyone doesn't like. The following cartoon is an example.

Revenge on a pacifist

One more example of the absurdity of pacifism can be cited. An ardent supporter of this movement was the German writer Erich Maria Remarque. In 1943, his sister was cut off her head on the guillotine for a careless statement (this was in 1943, in Germany), and the bill for the services of the executioner, 127 Reichmarks and 18 pfenings, was sent to the author of the Arc de Triomphe. It is hard to imagine that at the moment of receiving a cynical greeting from Nazi Germany Remarque remained a pacifist. The sister was the youngest.

The abstractness of the idea

The official ideology of pacifism is condemnation of the immorality of violence, opposition to it by peaceful means, condemnation of any war. Of course, among the pacifists there are convinced decent people, but basically this movement resembles a well-fed “Green Party”, which is kept for demonstration performances by supporters of peace and a healthy environment. Who is a pacifist? A supporter of all-forgiving patience, ready to endure the mental and physical pain inflicted on him in order to shame, stop, or, which is generally from the realm of fantasy, convert the villain to his faith. There are examples of this, but mostly artistic. By itself, the theory of "hit on one cheek - turn the other" does not fit with human dignity. She does not fit in with anything except sadomasochism.

Reluctance to serve

There is another benefit from pacifism - in the common people it is called "mow down from the army." This has been done since early Christianity. Justin Martyr, who lived in the 2nd century AD, was an ardent pacifist. But pacifism as an organized movement appeared in Europe after the Napoleonic Wars. At Soviet power little was said about pacifism. And to the question: "Who is a pacifist?" - most knowledgeable would answer: "Traitor." The most famous pacifist in our country has always been Pastor Schlag, brilliantly played by Rostislav Plyatt.

unattainable goal

In its purest abstract form, the idea of ​​pacifism is beautiful - killing is bad. The meaning of the word pacifist is also remarkably explained - a person who has devoted himself to the prevention of wars and violence on earth. The methods of achieving the set goal do not stand up to criticism.

Leo Tolstoy was a pacifist. Having seen enough of the horrors of the Crimean War, and he participated in the defense of Sevastopol, then, in his old age, the great writer was inclined to think that wars are not needed by mankind. And who, besides the militarists, claims the opposite?

The true enemy of the militarist

The beliefs of the representatives of both these directions are not entirely antagonistic. Who is a pacifist and militarist? The pacifist has already been mentioned above, and the militarist is a supporter of war, military power, intimidation and suppression of any resistance to his idea. And the word militaris, or "military" clearly and easily explains the essence of this phenomenon. An antagonist to a militarist can only be considered an anti-militarist, and not a pacifist. And this is perfectly confirmed by the symbolism of pacifism and anti-militarism. This means - "good should be with fists", in the truest sense of this phrase. In this light, the meaning of the word pacifist is defeatist.

The impotence of pacifism

It is possible to fight against war by peaceful means, and only if it is hypothetical in nature, and when it is in the full sense on the threshold of home, one must, like Pastor Schlag, put oneself on skis and go forward to an effective fight against fascism. In our time, when local wars are going on continuously, all methods of dealing with them are good, as long as they are effective. But posters won't stop the war. In this regard, who are pacifists? (photos will help answer this question).

Looking at them, I want to say "loafers", again, "mowing" from the army.

Speculative idea

There are a lot of worthy representatives of this movement, among them there are people with certain abilities, but among the militarists there are much more such people. And they must be adequately resisted, and the ideas of pacifism, in the best sense of the word, must be welcomed, and nothing more. You can quote the classic pacifists. For example, Marcus Aurelius used to say that the best revenge for evil is irresponsibility. In fact, he was the sole emperor, against whom only a madman would dare to use evil, and then he would not have lived very long. Marcus Aurelius himself, before his death, waged very active and successful wars. So his pacifism was purely cabinet character. The person whose interests are affected is more of a warrior than a pacifist. The meaning of the term, as stated above, is the non-recognition of any violence. In most cases, when confronted with real evil inflicted on him personally, the pacifist ceases to be such.

 


Sections



Advertising