Tolerance. From the history of the concept to modern socio-cultural meanings. Tutorial Bakulina Svetlana Dmitrievna
Express questionnaire "Index of tolerance" (G. U. Soldatova, O. A. Kravtsova, O. E. Khukhlaev, L. A. Shaigerova)
Processing of results. For quantitative analysis, the overall result is calculated, without dividing into subscales. Each answer to a direct statement is assigned a score from 1 to 6 (“strongly disagree” - 1 point, “strongly agree” - 6 points). Responses to reverse statements are assigned reverse points (“strongly disagree” - 6 points, “strongly agree” -1 point). The scores are then added up.
Numbers of direct statements: 1, 9, 11, 14, 16, 20, 21, 22.
Numbers of reverse statements: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19.
Individual or group assessment of the identified level of tolerance is carried out in the following steps.
22-60 - low level of tolerance. Such results testify to the high intolerance of a person and the presence of pronounced intolerant attitudes in relation to the world around him and people.
61–99 – middle level. Such results are shown by respondents who are characterized by a combination of both tolerant and intolerant traits. In some social situations they behave tolerantly, in others they may show intolerance.
100-132 - high level of tolerance. Representatives of this group have pronounced traits of tolerant personality. At the same time, it is necessary to understand that the results approaching the upper limit (more than 115 points) may indicate a blurring of the “boundaries of tolerance” in a person, associated, for example, with psychological infantilism, tendencies towards connivance, condescension or indifference. It is also important to consider that respondents in this range may exhibit a high degree social desirability (especially if they have an idea about the views of the researcher and the objectives of the study).
For a qualitative analysis of the aspects of tolerance, you can use the division into subscales:
1. Ethnic tolerance: 2, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 21.
2. Social tolerance: 1, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 20.
3. Tolerance as a personality trait: 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 19, 22.
Subscale " ethnic tolerance» reveals the attitude of a person towards representatives of other ethnic groups and attitudes in the field of intercultural interaction. The subscale "social tolerance" allows you to explore tolerant and intolerant manifestations in relation to various social groups (minorities, criminals, mentally ill people), as well as to study the attitudes of the individual in relation to some social processes. The subscale "tolerance as a personality trait" includes items that diagnose personality traits, attitudes and beliefs that largely determine a person's attitude to the world around him.
Soldatova G. U., Kravtsova O. A., Khulaev O. E. et al. Psychodiagnostics of tolerance // Psychologists on migrants and migration in Russia: inf. - analyze the bulletin. - M., 2002. - No. 4. - S. 59–65.
From the book Civilization ancient india by Basham Arthur From the book Civilization of Classical China the author Eliseeff VadimREFERENCE INDEX In this reference index, arranged in alphabetical order, most of the important concepts that appear in this work can be found. In addition, as is customary in the scientific works of the Great Civilizations series, in some articles the authors
From the book Japanese Civilization the author Eliseeff VadimReference index This reference index includes most of the important concepts that are mentioned in the text. The index is in alphabetical order. Moreover, in accordance with general principle building a series of authors in some sections in more detail
From the book Civilization of Classical Islam author Surdel DominicREFERENCE INDEX
From the book Civilizations of Ancient Europe author Mansuelli GuidoReference index This index does not claim to be encyclopedic at all. Its sole purpose is to make it easier for the reader to find reference information. Thus, for the most part, it contains important concepts that appear in the text. Besides, in
From the book Civilization of the Medieval West author Le Goff JacquesREFERENCE INDEX
From the book Civilization of Classical Europe by Shawnu PierreREFERENCE INDEX AabsolutismThe theory of absolute monarchy, formulated in England and France in the 16th century and in the rest of Europe in the 17th century. The king has absolute power to the extent that he is the source of all power, the source of law. But the king did
From the book Culturological Expertise: Theoretical Models and Practical Experience author Krivich Natalya AlekseevnaModern public holiday. Express research in the format of cultural expertise by A. S. Makashova
From the book Civilization of Enlightenment by Shawnu PierreREFERENCE INDEX This Index does not in any way claim to be encyclopedic. Its sole purpose is to make it easier for the reader to get to know the book. That is why it includes most of the keywords found in the text, with the corresponding
From the book Civilization Ancient Greece by Chamu Francois From the book Civilization ancient rome author Grimal PierreREFERENCE INDEX AAugust Gaius Octavius Turin, Caesar's great-nephew in the female line, was born in 63 BC. e. in the year of the consulate of Cicero and the conspiracy of Catiline. His father, who died in 58, belonged to a wealthy family from Velibra and was one of the first representatives of this
From the book Russian Australia author Kravtsov Andrey NikolaevichDistant Continent About Russian emigration in Australia through the eyes of researcher A. Kravtsov “Two feelings are wonderfully close to us: // In them the heart finds food// Love for the native ashes,// Love for the fatherly coffins” - these are the lines of Pushkin, written by him in 1830 ., involuntarily come to mind,
From the book Tolerance. From the history of the concept to modern socio-cultural meanings. Tutorial author Bakulina Svetlana DmitrievnaLektorsky VA About tolerance, pluralism and criticism (1997) 1. Tolerance as indifference The first understanding of tolerance, which I analyze, was the first and historically. In some respects, it is considered a classic and has survived to this day. It is associated with names.
From the author's bookNegative Argument for Tolerance The subject of tolerance is faced with an opinion or action that he considers wrong. And he not only rejects them for himself, but also believes that it would be wrong for any person to hold this opinion either
From the author's bookA Positive Argument for Tolerance The positive side of tolerance opens up a different perspective for us. If tolerance is a good thing and positive justifications can be put forward in its favor, there is no need to think of it as something we don't want to do. But how
From the author's bookDeclaration of Principles on Tolerance Approved by Resolution 5.61 of the UNESCO General Conference of 16 November 1995 The Member States of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, assembled in Paris for the twenty-eighth session of the General
Express questionnaire "Index of tolerance"
(authors G.U. Soldatova, O.A. Kravtsova, O.E. Khukhlaev, L.A.Shaigerova)
The Express Questionnaire is designed to diagnose:
– aspects of tolerance: general level and/or personality trait;
-types of tolerance: ethnic and social.
The stimulus material of the questionnaire was made up of statements reflecting:
The express questionnaire was developed by psychologists (Gratis Center) G.U. Soldatova, O.A. Kravtsova, O.E. Khukhlaev, L.A. Shaigerova in 2002. Basis: domestic and foreign experience.
1. tolerance as a personality trait, we reveal: a general attitude towards the world around us; attitude towards other people; social attitudes in various areas of interaction, where tolerance and intolerance of a person are manifested;
2. social tolerance, we reveal: attitude towards certain social groups (minorities, criminals, the mentally ill, the poor); communication attitudes (respect for the opinion of opponents, readiness for constructive conflict resolution, productive cooperation); attitudes of the individual in relation to some social processes.
3. ethnic tolerance / intolerance, we reveal: attitude towards people of a different race, ethnic group, towards one's own ethnic group; installations in the field of intercultural interaction.
Answer form
№ | Statement | Absolutely disagree | Disagree | Rather disagree | Rather agree | I agree | I completely agree |
|
Points (for "direct" statements) | ||||||||
1 C | Any opinion can be represented in the media | |||||||
arr | Mixed marriages usually have more problems than marriages between people of the same nationality | |||||||
3 L arr | If a friend betrayed, you need to take revenge on him | |||||||
arr | Caucasians will be treated better if they change their behavior | |||||||
5 L arr | Only one point of view can be correct in an argument. | |||||||
Beggars and vagabonds are to blame for their own problems | ||||||||
arr | ||||||||
arr | Dishonest people are unpleasant to deal with. | |||||||
9 L | Even if I have my own opinion, I am ready to listen to other points of view. | |||||||
10C arr | All mentally ill people must be isolated from society | |||||||
I am ready to accept a person of any nationality as a member of my family | ||||||||
12C arr | Refugees should be helped no more than everyone else, since local problems have no less | |||||||
13 L arr | If someone treats me rudely, I respond in kind | |||||||
I want to have people of different nationalities among my friends | ||||||||
15C arr | A “strong hand” is needed to restore order in the country | |||||||
16C | Visitors should have the same rights as local residents | |||||||
17 L | A person who thinks differently from me annoys me | |||||||
arr | Some nations and peoples are difficult to treat well | |||||||
19 L arr | Clutter annoys me a lot | |||||||
20С arr | Any religious movements have the right to exist | |||||||
I can imagine a black person as my close friend | ||||||||
22 L | I would like to become a more tolerant person towards others |
Processing of results.
Quantitative analysis - all scores are summed up. Each answer to direct the statement is assigned a score from 1 to 6 (“strongly disagree” - 1 point, “strongly agree” - 6 points). Responses to reverse statements are assigned reverse points (“strongly disagree” - 6 points, “strongly agree” - 1 point). Then the results are summarized.
Direct statements: 1,9,11,14,16,20,21,22; reverse: 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,13,15, 17,18,19.
Interpretation of results.
An individual or group assessment of the identified level of tolerance is carried out according to the following steps:
22-60 - low level of tolerance. Such results testify to the high intolerance of a person and the presence of pronounced intolerant attitudes in relation to the world around him and people.
61-99 - the average level. Such results are shown by respondents who are characterized by a combination of both tolerant and intolerant traits. In some social situations they behave tolerantly, in others they may show intolerance.
100-132 - high level of tolerance. Representatives of this group have pronounced traits of tolerant personality. At the same time, it is necessary to understand that the results approaching the upper limit (more than 115 points) may indicate a blurring of the “boundaries of tolerance” in a person, associated, for example, with psychological infantilism, tendencies towards connivance, condescension or indifference. It is also important to consider that respondents in this range may demonstrate a high degree of social desirability (especially if they have an understanding of the researcher's views and research goals).
For qualitative analysisaspects of tolerance, you can use the division into subscales:
Key for processing
1. Subscale "ethnic tolerance": 2, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 21.
2. Subscale "social tolerance": 1, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 20.
3. Subscale "tolerance as a personality trait": 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 19, 22.
(G.U. Soldatova, O.A. Kravtsova, O.E. Khukhlaev, L.A. Shaigerova)
To diagnose the general level of tolerance, a group of psychologists of the "Gratis" center developed an express questionnaire "Index of Tolerance". It is based on domestic and foreign experience in this area (Soldatova, Kravtsova, Khukhlaev, Shaigerova, 2002). The stimulus material of the questionnaire was made up of statements reflecting both the general attitude towards the surrounding world and other people, and social attitudes in various areas of interaction, where tolerance and intolerance of a person are manifested. The methodology includes statements that reveal attitudes towards certain social groups (minorities, mentally ill people, the poor), communication attitudes (respect for the opinion of opponents, readiness for constructive conflict resolution and productive cooperation). Special attention is paid to ethnic tolerance-intolerance (attitude towards people of a different race and ethnic group, towards one's own ethnic group, assessment of cultural distance). Three subscales of the questionnaire are aimed at diagnosing such aspects of tolerance as ethnic tolerance, social tolerance, tolerance as a personality trait.
No. Statement Strongly disagree Disagree Rather disagree Rather agree Agree Completely agree
1. Any opinion can be represented in the media
2. Mixed marriages usually have more problems than marriages between people of the same nationality.
3. If a friend betrayed, you need to take revenge on him
4. Caucasians will be treated better if they change their behavior
5. Only one point of view can be correct in a dispute.
6. Beggars and vagabonds are to blame for their own problems.
8. Untidy people are unpleasant to deal with.
9. Even if I have my own opinion, I am ready to listen to other points of view.
10. All mentally ill people must be isolated from society
11. I am ready to accept a person of any nationality as a member of my family
12. Refugees should be helped no more than everyone else, since local problems have no less
13. If someone treats me rudely, I answer the same
14. I want people of different nationalities among my friends.
15. A "strong hand" is needed to restore order in the country
16. Visitors should have the same rights as locals
17. A person who thinks differently from me annoys me.
18. Some nations and peoples are difficult to treat well.
19. Clutter annoys me a lot.
20. Any religious movements have the right to exist
21. I can imagine a black person as my close friend.
22. I would like to become a more tolerant person towards others.