Herculaneum, which was buried under the ash during the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in the first century AD, was first discovered leftovers wooden throne times ancient Rome. Found parts of a wooden throne era ancient Rima are two legs and part of the back. The find was made at the Villa of the Papyri (Villa dei Papiri), which belonged to...
https://www.site/journal/123548
Archaeologists working in China have discovered leftovers soup age 2.4 thousand years. Ancient the food was in a bronze vessel found in a grave in Shanxi province. Inside the container, scientists found several bones covered with patina - an oxide-carbonate film, which ...). In addition to a vessel with soup, archaeologists found a bronze cauldron, inside of which was a clear, odorless liquid. The authors believe that these may be leftovers ancient guilt.
https://www.site/journal/133227
And Canada managed not only to prove that supernovae are a powerful source of cosmic dust, but also to discover among leftovers supernova Cassiopeia A traces of a very unusual variant of this dust. This was reported in a press release ... installed on the 15-meter JCMT telescope, which is located in the Hawaiian Islands. Radiation analysis showed that in remnants supernova Cassiopeia A contains about as much dust as predicted by theory (more than one tenth of the mass of the Sun). At...
https://www.site/journal/117021
Fossil analysis leftovers ancient cephalopod mollusk forced paleontologists to reconsider the evolution of this group of organisms during the Cambrian explosion (500 million years ago). ... He did without a shell What surprised paleontologists was the lack of a shell in a mollusk. Until now, they believed that the most ancient the representative of the cephalopods had a hollow multi-chambered shell, like modern nautiluses. Moreover, scientists believed that such a shell, which can be filled ...
https://www.site/journal/126743
Cultures began on different continents almost simultaneously and, most importantly, from the same root. Remains ancient sciences, astronomical and logical-mathematical discoveries were restored and preserved by the priests of Egypt, Babylon, Sumer, ... the principles of the structure of the Universe were in unity with their theological interpretation; their separation will come later. Basic provisions ancient The logical-mathematical system was required to derive everything from one source - from the One First Number, from the Pleroma, and ...
https://www.site/journal/13426
There are still traces of old cities and fortifications in which these peoples were located. A similar approach, when the existence ancient cities on the territory of Siberia, as it were, is not denied, but researchers are not particularly interested in it, it is preserved to the present ... what is there! - thousands of years before the appearance of Yermak. Archaeologists, with few exceptions, have hardly excavated leftovers Russian fortresses, cities and settlements, although there is a lot of information about these signs of the highest civilization of the peoples who once lived ...
https://www.site/journal/146779
British archaeologists have unearthed an amazing find on the territory of one of London's Belmarsh prisons. Scientists have discovered leftovers ancient wooden building in London - its age is about six thousand years. Belmarsh Prison, located ... no scientific luminaries are struggling to unravel its purpose, but to no avail. There are many versions of why ancient erected this structure: someone considers it a hospital, some are even sure that this is a kind of airfield for aliens. ...
In North America, it has a rather rich history. In addition to the fact that he constantly passed from hand to hand, the colonial powers during their wars. He was also the last refuge of the "5 civilized tribes" of the Indians, after which they completely declined during the expansion of the mainland. Plus, the state fought on the side of the Confederation (South), and as we know, there were many questions about who fought with whom and in the name of what. Then there are many photos.
The modern state will give odds to Venice and bypass it by a large margin. It is just a country of canals coming from nowhere and out of nowhere. There are thousands of kilometers of them. New, old, large and small. My first thought was. So much shit?
It's generally gorgeous. 26°58‘5.11″N 82°22‘41.78″W 
Let's stop at this for now. For the presentation, I think it's enough.
What else can you look for to confirm the theory of the ancient metropolis. I think the traces of the war. Our favorite round lakes.
1.1 Why not Chelyabinsk lakes. 
1.2. 29°57‘45.34″N 81°58‘58.88″W 
Well, now the most delicious. Why did I decide that the Pindos restored the old infrastructure and built their own. Like the Australians, they built their own, taking straight lines crossing the entire continent as a guide.
2.1 This is what a modern district looks like. (26°50′26.9″N 81°59′19.1″W) 
2.2. Although, this way you can better see the similarity between the New and the old. (26°50′58.6″N 82°02′28.9″W) 
2.4. It seems to be turning into this. So as not to get lost. (26°51′39.8″N 82°13′20.3″W)
2.5. Well, this is striking in its scale. (26°51′53.3″N 82°16′24.8″W) 
Lead an unbroken circle. Let's look into the gap.
2.6.(26°51′53.3″N 82°16′24.8″W) 
See? It used to be a huge closed circle with a diameter of 5 km. Now there are only remnants of it that were used during construction, and without much change. That is, before, I think it was the same. .Which have not yet been built up. And there are a lot of interesting things there. But I think that's enough. By the way, just under water, between Cuba and Philadelphia, they found the "Cuban Pyramids".
My conclusion. When they found the megaliths of New York, which were brought by KAMAZ vehicles and filled the coastline. I thought, how do the townsfolk not notice this? Now I understand. Here, entire megacities are built over the area on the ruins of the old one and no one goes into it. And there, some stones with images.
14. Suspicious drying up of water bodies over the past 100 years, rivers, lakes, swamps and other bodies of water on land become very shallow, dry up, the amount of water is constantly decreasing, which leads to climate change. The rate of this drying up, if compared over the past 100 years, over hundreds of years would lead to the complete drying up of almost all closed reservoirs, fed only by spring floods or precipitation.
15. False inflation of the hypothesis of global warming, which globally has nothing to do with either the content of CO2 in the atmosphere or solar activity, but is associated with only one thing - the presence and quantity on the land surface (including in its thickness) of a substance capable of accumulating and give off heat, namely water, in its various states of aggregation: liquid water and ice.
16. Rivers. Absolutely everything, from huge to small streams, the rivers have gullies incommensurable with the current channel, the width exceeding the current ones, from several times, to tens of times, more than the current channel. The banks of these gullies are formed by the simultaneous flow of water, strictly along the course of the current rivers, the water level is much higher (tens of times in volume) than the current volume of water in the rivers, the level of the slopes of these rivers, their uniformity over the entire plane, a small number of ravines to the current river ( slight destruction of the slopes by ravines), their size (depth) speaks of a small amount of time that has elapsed since their formation until the present day.
The presence of washed-out and swampy areas along the rivers, the presence of oxbow lakes (periodic changes in the channels), at a great distance from the current channel, isolated reservoirs without external recharge (now drying up), along the rivers, indicates that in the very recent past, the amount of water in all rivers was immeasurably more. Judging by the water erosion of the surface of the slopes and adjacent territories, it was several hundred years, no more. Very often there are perfectly even, tens of kilometers long, rivers in the flat areas, which may indicate their artificial origin, once they were canals. A strange formation of high banks with an opposite low bank, usually on the north or northwest side.
17. Rivers in settlements. In all settlements near the rivers, there are washed away territories, even on a hill up to tens of meters from the current level of the river. Even if there is a low opposite bank! Now these territories are parks, reserves, reserves, stadiums, wastelands, industrial zones, building sites only in the 20th century. At the same time, they contain destroyed or heavily “sagging” historical buildings and structures, as a rule, quite large (Churches, Fortresses, Monasteries). Moreover, at a serious distance from modern streets and even settlements, which suggests that they were once part of a denser building, or estates.
18. Ravines. On the plains, in places where there is insufficient water for their formation (low rainfall, groundwater, reservoirs, etc.), there are a lot of ravines. Moreover, in their structure and condition of the slopes, these ravines are very similar to the rivers that exist in the same area. The condition of their slopes, their structure is practically no different from the lowland rivers and what is said about the rivers above.
19. Fortresses, castles, kremlins. Until the 17th century, all over the world there were a huge number of fortresses, star fortresses, castles, monasteries, with high fortress walls, especially near rivers, reservoirs, kremlins (essentially the same fortresses), which in their structure had many times the their fortification purpose, according to the types of weapons used in those wars. Most of them are either completely destroyed at the moment, or according to the OI, in the 17-19th centuries they were destroyed by war (cannonballs), survived terrible fires that completely or partially destroyed them. Moreover, most of them were known as early as the 18th century, were mapped, described in many later literary works. The costs for their construction, the presence in the 18th century, when there were no mass wars according to the Olympic Games, the remoteness from the theaters of military operations of those years (for example, in Siberia, in the Northern cities), indicate that their purpose was clearly not for protection from raids.
In particular, the star fortresses are of interest, of which in many cases there is little left:
Krasny Yar
Fort Sagres, Portugal:
Venezuela:
20. Mountain towns and monasteries. In many places in the mountains there are remains of mountain towns capable of accommodating thousands of inhabitants. Crimea, Caucasus, Turkey, Middle East, America, Kazakhstan, Carpathians, etc. The purpose of these cities, their time of use, logistical inaccessibility, labor costs for their construction and transport inconvenience of the location suggest that the reason for their appearance can only be the need to protect against something very destructive, the need to save a certain number of inhabitants from some cataclysm occurring or likely to occur below these cities, in the lowlands.
So it was conceived, or did the soft (temporarily softened by thermal or other influences) columns squint under the weight of the wall blocks?
Jordan:
Did the plasterer cheat? 0_o
Layers are visible almost everywhere:
For comparison, here is a melted brick:
Clearly leaking:
North America:
Bandelier National Monument
Spain Ausejo:
Kazakhstan, Shakpak Ata:
Germany Regenstein:
Russia:
Who fidgeted with dirty fingers on soft granite ice-cream?
Isn't it obvious that it was a pyramid? Just one half of it collapsed. There are smaller pyramids nearby. Everything is exactly like in Giza.
What kind of idol with a tail, isn't it a dragon, by any chance?
India:
South America:
Traces of a powerful impact and melting are clearly visible. Obviously they didn't shoot firecrackers:
These comrades are now crawling out from under the "cultural layer", Mother Earth is simply pushing them out of herself (frames from here):
In general, petrified pipes in the rock, which do not fit into the official version, incl. with metal gasket:
It is now that yogis walk on smoldering coals, but real ancient superyogis wandered through boiling magma!
North America:
England:
A little from everywhere:
And don't forget about ancient careers:
Antarctica. There are even traces of the tracks of heavy equipment preserved. 
Greenland. Watkins mountains. How do you like the scale of production? But these are still flowers. 
Antarctica. Transantarctic Mountains. Traces of technology are still visible at the foot 
Antarctica. Transantarctic Mountains. Quarry system. Pay attention to the background. 
Quarry in Australia. Called the Blue Mountains 
21. Sacred Mountains. All nations have sacred mountains. Moreover, it is very difficult to find explanations of what is so sacred in them.
In fact, mountains are giants of mineral life. Wise and able to tell a lot.
22. Holy springs. All over the world, especially in the highlands, there are ancient sacred springs, usually with religious overtones. Often these springs are located in the mountains or on hills, often on the territory of monasteries, also located on hills.
23. Kitchen. In many countries, the cuisine is replete with ingredients that do not correspond to the growing possibilities of these crops in the region where it is located. Pepper and spices in fairly northern regions where these crops do not grow now. National cuisines abound with plants that were either introduced at a fairly late time, according to the OI. For example, corn comes from America, in Moldova. An age-old culture of growing, processing and storing plants originating thousands of kilometers south or even from other continents, for example, American potatoes in Belarus, cucumbers, onions, cabbage in European Russia (originally from North Africa or Western Asia). At the same time, there is a long tradition of culture of cultivation, use in food, processing and storage.
It is not clear how the southern onions or cucumbers with cabbage could adapt to the harsh northern regions, northern varieties appeared. Moreover, these cultures are very ancient history. There are about 80 (!) varieties of pineapples grown throughout Russia in greenhouses, but still, where does such diversity, the ability to grow and such addictions of local northern residents come from?
Southern wheat, the northern varieties of which, cultivated north of the Voronezh region, appeared only in the second half of the 20th century, was known and used in the cuisine of our ancestors since ancient times, and so on to Arkhangelsk. The use of mass, back in the 17th century amaranth in Russia, comes from South America, which was discovered in the same century a century earlier, and who managed to conquer such expanses of the Northern Country?
Tea, coffee, tobacco? The cuisine of some peoples, now considered a delicacy, could only come from a very terrible shortage of food, for example, the use of frogs in food by the French and Vietnamese, snails, etc., speaks of times, and long ones, when they may have been the only living creatures that can save you from hunger.
24. Architecture. Similarities in architecture, building materials and construction technologies. Architectures on vast territories, at a distance of thousands of kilometers, and on different continents. Extreme technical complexity in the design and construction of some buildings and structures with the complete (supposedly) absence of drawings, strength of materials, technical documentation, technical and aesthetic perfection of architecture of the 17th-19th centuries.
In the northern latitudes, even until the 20th century, there were buildings and structures that were not designed for this climate. All of them, as a rule, come from no later than the 18th, early 19th centuries. There was no heating in these buildings. The so-called summer temples, huge places of worship, designed without taking into account the cold and frost, in areas where even now it is cold up to 8 months a year. Residential buildings with huge windows, with huge heat losses, also without heating (most of them were heated either by stoves added in the 19th century, or during their reconstruction, changes were made and heating systems were created.1
Most of the buildings were designed and built with flat roofs, which is extremely impractical for the northern regions, because. led to the leakage of roofs due to the melting of snow, and the lack of rainwater runoff. Moreover, the second half of the 19th century, this short-sightedness has already ruled out. Buildings are already designed for the northern cold climate, with heating, with pitched roofs that have a slope for snow and rain, with smaller windows than a century earlier.
Almost all buildings built earlier than the 19th century have a deep “settlement in the cultural layer”, and a very uniform one, which, according to science, did not lead to the destruction of the entire structure of the building. As a result of which the first floors of the buildings ended up in the ground, the plinths on which these buildings were built also disappeared. The aesthetic and technical design was violated, an additional opportunity appeared for the penetration of moisture from the ground into the building itself, its walls, which leads to a violation of the waterproofing and a faster destruction of walls in the northern latitudes, which have a greater freezing depth.
Reconstruction of the museum. Vrubel, Omsk, covered windows and doors
The loss of technology in building materials in the 19th century, a change in construction technology, the use of building materials (foundations and walls were previously built from limestone blocks, later from brick; brick was earlier more durable, later less durable), the use of rolled products in the construction (obviously superior in characteristics to rolled products of the 19th and 20th centuries, for example, the metal structures of the base of the Dome of St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg - the structure did not succumb to corrosion even after 300 years), etc. +
25. Megabuildings of the 18th-19th centuries. In the 18-19th centuries, a huge number of structures (canals, roads, railways, buildings and structures), in terms of the volume of work performed, the quality and construction technologies, the places of their construction, the remoteness from the places of production of materials, the timing of construction, which are not amenable to logical explanation, do not correspond to the level of available and used building material, the qualifications of builders (according to the OI, they built either serfs, or soldiers, under the guidance of an experienced European architect).
For example: the Nikolaev railway was built in the shortest possible time (less than 10 years, in places, even in the 20th century, heavily swampy, sparsely populated, in a climate - having up to 9 months a year of cold, rain, snow and frost). Transsib - built on time, about 10 years, in areas with a minimum population density, remoteness from the places of production of rails, sleepers, etc.). At the same time, tens of thousands of kilometers of railways were built during the same period, surpassing similar works in the 20th century in terms of the volume of construction work.
26. Population. The main resource of any state is its people. The people are the army that waged wars in the 18th and 19th centuries. This is the production of agricultural products for the army, builders, for sale within the country and abroad. These are workers in factories and factories, builders, service representatives, clergy, doctors, teachers, etc. These are taxes for the treasury, from which, again, government spending is financed. And here there is a problem.
According to more or less official data, the population Russian Empire at the end of the 19th century, was about 110-120 million people. Taking into account the population of Poland, Finland, Turkestan, the Caucasus. The official population growth is, as it were, about 2 percent per year, which is very strange and suspiciously small, given that the population of about 80% is rural population, and families there were from 5 to 15 children, they also began to give birth very early, from the age of 15.
Those. For 20 years (even 35-40 years, the average life expectancy), from two parents there were already 3-4 heirs for each parent, and taking into account the fact that there were already often grandchildren, by the death of the first parents, the increase for 40 years was at least 100%.1
But even with a 2 percent increase, the calculation in reverse side gives no more than 15-20 million people for the entire Russian Empire. If we count 100 years into the past, then even that is about 500 thousand - a million. For the entire territory of the Russian Empire. This raises the question of the possibilities of building what is described above, and the next paragraph.
Speaking of wars:
In the funnels of Belarus given as an example, there is water, since the level of groundwater is apparently high. But there are a lot of funnels without water on the surface of the planet. For example, in Ukraine: 
27. Expansion. At the beginning of the 19th century, there was a populated area from Kaliningrad to Vladivostok, from Arkhangelsk to the Pamirs. Siberia is inhabited along the northern sea route, along the Siberian rivers. There are thousands of populated cities in abundance on the maps, all over the territory. Around each city there are dozens of villages and villages (otherwise the city will not survive and even not appear). Total: tens of thousands of settlements throughout the territory.
Question: Why? Why do we need such a complex, dangerous and unpredictable expansion from a fairly comfortable area of Southern Europe? 10-20 million people can easily disperse throughout Central Russia, while 5 million will live by the sea, enjoying the southern sun and fruit with wine. What or who should force people to leave their homes and go for hundreds or thousands of kilometers, in an unknown direction, to the taiga, to Siberia, to the North? And most importantly why?
Well, let's say, Stolypin's reforms of the mass settlement of Siberia (and who, then, was building the Trans-Siberian Railway and for whom a dozen years before), and who inhabited the cities of Siberia, which supposedly hundreds of years before that lived there quietly and are healthy? And let me remind you that contemporaries considered the Stolypin resettlement to be unique! So, before such operations were not turned on such a scale?
So, it turns out that in the 19th century, the entire territory of Russia was already populated by natural expansion, the gradual settlement of new territories, when the previous ones had already been mastered and the population size allows you to look for new territories for agricultural activities, and only then a city arises there that provides the village with everything you need, and most importantly! People will not go north, to worse conditions, if the south allows them to settle without problems!
Then it turns out that either hundreds of years were needed for natural expansion, or the settlement was forced (and apart from Voronezh with Peter 1, the Olympic Games do not show us more such events, and this is not the North) ... Or the climate during this expansion was completely different. And most importantly, the population at the end of this expansion should not be 20 million people capable of dissolving in Central Russia. And at times, and maybe tens of times more. 
Groups for news and discussions:
Location - Tsimlyansk reservoir, Rostov region. Right on the shore lie the ruins of granite boulders and their small fragments. They are characteristically covered (partially) by a layer of clay sediments. It must be understood that the water washed away part of the clay, exposing the debris under it.
General view of the shore with debris
And here are the photos of the excavations of Sarkel:
But back to the find:
The most interesting thing is that in many boulders there are even round holes, clearly artificial.
Hole in the top of the large stone in the center
Material - possibly granite, but I do not exclude that it is just dense sandstone
When I pointed out these holes to people and asked them to speculate about their origin - they said that these were definitely traces of blasting - during modern construction.
That is, a hole is drilled, a charge (checker or gunpowder) is laid - an explosion and small fragments go into action.
In favor of this assumption, the fact that it is really not far away works - the coast is landscaped with these small debris.
Disadvantages of the version: I understand that the explosion should destroy the hole. However, we see that they are intact. And also the fact that the boulders were partially covered with clay suggests that nothing was blown up there - in the event of an explosion, all this clay would have been scattered hundreds of meters around. Also, no craters or other characteristic traces of blasting are visible.
Rounded boulder. Maybe he was swept with water. Or maybe casting. A strange upper texture is visible.
The boulder on the right is covered with a layer of clay. Did she inflict it after the blasting or what?
Boulders in the water - there are plenty of them at the bottom too. This is a flooded area, a reservoir.
Photoplans of the surroundings:
Google maps for this area:
The strip of debris is quite even, as if specially poured. But it is definitely not specially poured - it is felt when you stand nearby, everything is chaotic, everything is covered with pressed clay. The entire shore is covered with small crumbs.
and one more thing: it is there that the Sarkel fortress is located under the clay, and there is more than one fortress there and it is not clear whether it is Sarkel or not, and if so, which one. Officially, historians call it the left-bank settlement and the right-bank settlement. One of them is now at the bottom of the reservoir.
The most consistent thing that I see is that the ancient granite objects were destroyed by a strong blow (natural or weapons do not matter), and then the mudflow moved them very evenly and covered them - well, or something like that. Otherwise, it is not clear why they lay down in such an even strip. What kind of holes it is also not clear - is it really something modern (they are even and the same), but it is not clear why they were made. There were no explosions - traces would be visible
if these are ancient holes, then it is also not clear why they are and why there are no holes of other diameters.
By the way, the texture of the surface in the holes is no different from the rest of the stone surface - I don’t think that they were drilled in the last decades, the holes are obviously very old, some have lost their round shape, there are no traces of the drill - there are no radial stripes anywhere either.
: Most likely it is a quarry. In addition to explosions, there is a technology for splitting with wedges. But drilling for it is not necessary through holes. If this is for checkers or gunpowder, then there was already at least gunpowder. Another thought arose that it was being dismantled by the remains of something very ancient.
Are you afraid of death? This terrible phobia scientific language sounds like thanatophobia and, to some extent, is found, perhaps, in every person. Perhaps death is the biggest mystery for mankind, because no one has yet been able to find out what happens after its onset.
However, there are many different theories on the topic of death, and the author of one of the most interesting is the American scientist Robert Lanza. In his opinion, death does not really exist - people invented it themselves.
To some, the theory may seem like the ravings of a madman, but you cannot call Robert Lantz as such. During his life, the 63-year-old scientist made a huge contribution to the study of stem cells used to restore organs. He is also the author of numerous books in which he even touches on the topic of cloning. For his merits, he even won a place in the ranking of the 100 most influential people in the world according to TIME magazine.
Does death exist?
In 2007, the scientist created the concept of the so-called biocentrism. We are all used to believing that life arose due to the existence of the universe, but the theory of Robert Lantz completely reverses this idea. The scientist put into the term biocentrism the idea that we, living beings, are the center of everything that surrounds us - we even create time and the universe itself.
Death is no exception either. According to Robert Lantz, death exists for us only because we begin to identify ourselves with our body from early childhood. After all, we all believe that after stopping the work of all our organs, the same terrible and unknown death will inevitably await us? But the scientist is sure that even with the inoperability of the body itself, the human mind continues to work and simply moves to another world.
What happens after death?
Feels mystical, doesn't it? However, the scientist substantiates his words with the rules quantum mechanics, according to which in reality there are a huge number of options for the development of events. For example, if in one of the "realities" (or Universes, call it what you want) a person died after falling off a cliff, then in some parallel worlds he will sense the danger in time and avoid death. The consciousness that was inside the already dead body will smoothly move into another reality where the person is alive. In a word, human consciousness is immortal and exists outside of space and time.
Human consciousness is an energy that does not disappear and cannot be destroyed. It can only move endlessly and change its shape, - Robert Lanza explained in one of his works.